Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086267›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Developing a Quantitative Ultrasound Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Assess Tumor Treatment Efficacy Using a Mouse Model.

Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei, Joshua VanOsdol, Morteza Heidari, Gopichandh Danala, Sri Nandhini Sethuraman, Ashish Ranjan, Bin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developing global image feature analysis models to predict cancer risk and prognosis.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seyedehnafiseh MirniaharikandeheiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-4517
Joshua VanOsdolCenter for Veterinary Health Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 74078, OK, USA.
Morteza HeidariSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA.
Gopichandh DanalaSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA.
Sri Nandhini SethuramanCenter for Veterinary Health Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 74078, OK, USA.
Ashish RanjanCenter for Veterinary Health Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 74078, OK, USA.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, OK, USA. bin.zheng-1@ou.edu.

Funding

Increasing Cancer Detection Yield Using Breast MRI Screening ModalityR01CA197150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, ALAN B., LIU, HONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of identifying and applying quantitative imaging features computed from ultrasound images of athymic nude mice to predict tumor response to treatment at an early stage. A computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme with a graphic user interface was developed to conduct tumor segmentation and image feature analysis. A dataset involving ultrasound images of 23 athymic nude mice bearing C26 mouse adenocarcinomas was assembled. These mice were divided into 7 treatment groups utilizing a combination of thermal and nanoparticle-controlled drug delivery. Longitudinal ultrasound images of mice were taken prior and post-treatment in day 3 and day 6. After tumor segmentation, CAD scheme computed image features and created four feature pools including features computed from (1) prior treatment images only and (2) difference between prior and post-treatment images of day 3 and day 6, respectively. To predict tumor treatment efficacy, data analysis was performed to identify top image features and an optimal feature fusion method, which have a higher correlation to tumor size increase ratio (TSIR) determined at Day 10. Using image features computed from day 3, the highest Pearson Correlation coefficients between the top two features selected from two feature pools versus TSIR were 0.373 and 0.552, respectively. Using an equally weighted fusion method of two features computed from prior and post-treatment images, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.679. Meanwhile, using image features computed from day 6, the highest correlation coefficient was 0.680. Study demonstrated the feasibility of extracting quantitative image features from the ultrasound images taken at an early treatment stage to predict tumor response to therapies.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticColonColonic NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalDoxorubicinDrug CarriersFeasibility StudiesHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansHyperthermia, InducedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiceNanoparticlesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID31086267
PMCPMC6513863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.