ArticleScientific reports2019
Developing a Quantitative Ultrasound Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Assess Tumor Treatment Efficacy Using a Mouse Model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Converting focused ultrasound-based boiling histotripsy into a systemic cancer vaccine using antigen-capturing microparticles.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Preclinical Application of Computer-Aided High-Frequency Ultrasound (HFUS) Imaging: A Preliminary Report on the In Vivo Characterization of Hepatic Steatosis Progression in Mouse Models.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Iontophoresis-Enhanced Buccal Delivery of Cisplatin-Encapsulated Chitosan Nanoparticles for Treating Oral Cancer in a Mouse Model.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Image-guided intratumoral immunotherapy: Developing a clinically practical technology.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Applying a random projection algorithm to optimize machine learning model for predicting peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients using CT images.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends on Ultrasound Microbubble: A Quickly Developing Field.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Establishment of an Endoscopy-Guided Minimally Invasive Orthotopic Mouse Model of Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2020Article
- Establishment of a guided, in vivo, multi-channel, abdominal, tissue imaging approach.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Developing global image feature analysis models to predict cancer risk and prognosis.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of identifying and applying quantitative imaging features computed from ultrasound images of athymic nude mice to predict tumor response to treatment at an early stage. A computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme with a graphic user interface was developed to conduct tumor segmentation and image feature analysis. A dataset involving ultrasound images of 23 athymic nude mice bearing C26 mouse adenocarcinomas was assembled. These mice were divided into 7 treatment groups utilizing a combination of thermal and nanoparticle-controlled drug delivery. Longitudinal ultrasound images of mice were taken prior and post-treatment in day 3 and day 6. After tumor segmentation, CAD scheme computed image features and created four feature pools including features computed from (1) prior treatment images only and (2) difference between prior and post-treatment images of day 3 and day 6, respectively. To predict tumor treatment efficacy, data analysis was performed to identify top image features and an optimal feature fusion method, which have a higher correlation to tumor size increase ratio (TSIR) determined at Day 10. Using image features computed from day 3, the highest Pearson Correlation coefficients between the top two features selected from two feature pools versus TSIR were 0.373 and 0.552, respectively. Using an equally weighted fusion method of two features computed from prior and post-treatment images, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.679. Meanwhile, using image features computed from day 6, the highest correlation coefficient was 0.680. Study demonstrated the feasibility of extracting quantitative image features from the ultrasound images taken at an early treatment stage to predict tumor response to therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.