Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086117›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

Mouse Vendor Influence on the Bacterial and Viral Gut Composition Exceeds the Effect of Diet.

Torben Sølbeck Rasmussen, Liv de Vries, Witold Kot, Lars Hestbjerg Hansen, Josué L Castro-Mejía, Finn Kvist Vogensen, Axel Kornerup Hansen, Dennis Sandris Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Alternating High-Fat and Polysaccharide Diets Modulates Gut Phage-Bacterial Interplay.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex, drugs and high fat diet: Characterizing HFpEF in female C57BL6/J mice.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Torben Sølbeck RasmussenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark. torben@food.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-8953
Liv de VriesDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark. devries.liv@gmail.com.
Witold KotDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. wk@envs.au.dk.
Lars Hestbjerg HansenDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. lhha@envs.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0027-1524
Josué L Castro-MejíaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark. jcame@food.ku.dk.
Finn Kvist VogensenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark. fkv@food.ku.dk.
Axel Kornerup HansenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark. akh@sund.ku.dk.
Dennis Sandris NielsenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark. dn@food.ku.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Often physiological studies using mice from one vendor show different outcome when being reproduced using mice from another vendor. These divergent phenotypes between similar mouse strains from different vendors have been assigned to differences in the gut microbiome. During recent years, evidence has mounted that the gut viral community plays a key role in shaping the gut microbiome and may thus also influence mouse phenotype. However, to date inter-vendor variation in the murine gut virome has not been studied. Using a metavirome approach, combined with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we here compare the composition of the viral and bacterial gut community of C57BL/6N mice from three different vendors exposed to either a chow-based low-fat diet or high-fat diet. Interestingly, both the bacterial and the viral component of the gut community differed significantly between vendors. The different diets also strongly influenced both the viral and bacterial gut community, but surprisingly the effect of vendor exceeded the effect of diet. In conclusion, the vendor effect is substantial not only on the gut bacterial community but also strongly influences viral community composition. Given the effect of GM on mice phenotype, this is essential to consider for increasing reproducibility of mouse studies.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesDietAnimalsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaDiet, High-FatDNA, BacterialDNA, ViralFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, ViralRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sanimal model reproducibilityBacteriophagesgut microbiotavendor effectvirome

Identifiers

PMID31086117
PMCPMC6563299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.