Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31086038›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Response of Microbial Communities and Their Metabolic Functions to Drying⁻Rewetting Stress in a Temperate Forest Soil.

Dong Liu, Katharina M Keiblinger, Sonja Leitner, Uwe Wegner, Michael Zimmermann, Stephan Fuchs, Christian Lassek, Katharina Riedel, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Indicators for assessment of soil quality: a mini-review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Dong LiuInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. liudongc@mail.kib.ac.cn.
Katharina M KeiblingerInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. katharina.keiblinger@boku.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-4668-3866
Sonja LeitnerInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. s.leitner@cgiar.org.
Uwe WegnerInstitute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 15, 17489 Greifswald, Germany. wegner@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8301-1359
Michael ZimmermannInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. michael.zimmermann@blw.admin.ch.
Stephan FuchsInstitute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 15, 17489 Greifswald, Germany. fuchss@rki.de.
Christian LassekInstitute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 15, 17489 Greifswald, Germany. chrislassek@web.de.
Katharina RiedelInstitute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 15, 17489 Greifswald, Germany. riedela@uni-greifswald.de.
Sophie Zechmeister-BoltensternInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria. sophie.zechmeister@boku.ac.at.
Universität Greifswald · DEBOKU University · ATFederal Office for Agriculture · CHInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEKunming Institute of Botany · CN

Funding

Austrian Climate Research Program KR13AC6K11008National Natural Sciences Foundation of China 41701317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global climate change is predicted to alter drought-precipitation patterns, which will likely affect soil microbial communities and their functions, ultimately shifting microbially-mediated biogeochemical cycles. The present study aims to investigate the simultaneous variation of microbial community compositions and functions in response to drought and following rewetting events, using a soil metaproteomics approach. For this, an established field experiment located in an Austrian forest with two levels (moderate and severe stress) of precipitation manipulation was evaluated. The results showed that fungi were more strongly influenced by drying and rewetting (DRW) than bacteria, and that there was a drastic shift in the fungal community towards a more Ascomycota-dominated community. In terms of functional responses, a larger number of proteins and a higher functional diversity were observed in both moderate and severe DRW treatments compared to the control. Furthermore, in both DRW treatments a rise in proteins assigned to "translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis" and "protein synthesis" suggests a boost in microbial cell growth after rewetting. We also found that the changes within intracellular functions were associated to specific phyla, indicating that responses of microbial communities to DRW primarily shifted microbial functions. Microbial communities seem to respond to different levels of DRW stress by changing their functional potential, which may feed back to biogeochemical cycles.

Indexed as

drying–rewettingmicrobial diversitymicrobial functionsoil proteins

Identifiers

PMID31086038
PMCPMC6560457
OpenAlexW2944178628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.