Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085979›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Tart Cherry Concentrate Does Not Alter the Gut Microbiome, Glycaemic Control or Systemic Inflammation in a Middle-Aged Population.

Rebecca Lear, Mary O'Leary, Lee O'Brien Andersen, Corey Carrington Holt, Christen Rune Stensvold, Mark van der Giezen, Joanna L Bowtell

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Differentiation ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca LearDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK. rl442@exeter.ac.uk.
Mary O'LearyDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK. m.oleary@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1845-9568
Lee O'Brien AndersenLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Bacteria, Parasites & Fungi, Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. OBI@ssi.dk.
Corey Carrington HoltBiosciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK. corey.holt@cefas.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4222-6086
Christen Rune StensvoldLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Bacteria, Parasites & Fungi, Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. RUN@ssi.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-7048
Mark van der GiezenBiosciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK. m.vandergiezen@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-1335
Joanna L BowtellDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK. J.Bowtell@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Cherry Marketing Institute 000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited evidence suggests that the consumption of polyphenols may improve glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity. The gut microbiome produces phenolic metabolites and increases their bioavailability. A handful of studies have suggested that polyphenol consumption alters gut microbiome composition. There are no data available investigating such effects in polyphenol-rich Montmorency cherry (MC) supplementation. A total of 28 participants (aged 40-60 years) were randomized to receive daily MC or glucose and energy-matched placebo supplementation for 4 wk. Faecal and blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 4 wk. There was no clear effect of supplementation on glucose handling (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and Gutt indices), although the Matsuda index decreased significantly in the MC group post-supplementation, reflecting an increase in serum insulin concentration. Contrastingly, placebo, but not MC supplementation induced a 6% increase in the Oral Glucose Insulin Sensitivity (OGIS) estimate of glucose clearance. Serum IL-6 and C reactive protein were unaltered by either supplement. The faecal bacterial microbiome was sequenced; species richness and diversity were unchanged by MC or placebo and no significant correlation existed between changes in

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseC-Reactive ProteinDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene Expression RegulationGlucoseHumansInflammationInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseC-Reactive ProteinGlucoseInterleukin-6Plant ExtractscherrymicrobiomeMontmorencypolyphenol

Identifiers

PMID31085979
PMCPMC6567170
OpenAlexW2944678693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.