Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085972›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2019

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and ultrasonography (US) in the study of the small bowel in Crohn's disease: state of the art and review of the literature.

Rosa Manetta, Ilaria Capretti, Noemi Belleggia, Claudia Marsecano, Angelo Viscido, Federico Bruno, Francesco Arrigoni, Liheng Ma, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Alessandra Splendiani and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Body Composition Predictors of Complicated Crohn's Disease.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rosa ManettaDivision of Radiology, S. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy. antonio.barile@cc.univaq.it.
Ilaria Capretti
Noemi Belleggia
Claudia Marsecano
Angelo Viscido
Federico Bruno
Francesco Arrigoni
Liheng Ma
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Alessandra Splendiani
Ernesto Di Cesare
Carlo Masciocchi
Antonio Barile

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic idiopathic disease and its diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, laboratory tests and imaging data. There isn't a diagnostic gold standard: the ileocolonoscopy with mucosal biopsies represents the standard for luminal disease, while cross-sectional imaging such as Ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can show transmural alterations and extraintestinal manifestations. CD is usually diagnosed in the young age and after baseline diagnosis, the patients have to undergo to variable follow-up depending on remission or active disease. The aim of our review is to compare Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) to Ultrasonography (US) in the follow-up of CD.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseHumansIntestine, SmallMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31085972
PMCPMC6625566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.