Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085656›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Decreasing measles burden by optimizing campaign timing.

Niket Thakkar, Syed Saqlain Ahmad Gilani, Quamrul Hasan, Kevin A McCarthy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Studying Public Perception about Vaccination: A Sentiment Analysis of Tweets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Niket ThakkarInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bellevue, WA 98005; nthakkar@idmod.org.
Syed Saqlain Ahmad GilaniMinistry of National Health Services, Regulations, and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Quamrul HasanNational Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kevin A McCarthyInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bellevue, WA 98005.ORCID 0000-0002-9148-8448
Bellevue Hospital Center · USMinistry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination · PKNational Institute of Health · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles remains a major contributor to preventable child mortality, and bridging gaps in measles immunity is a fundamental challenge to global health. In high-burden settings, mass vaccination campaigns are conducted to increase access to vaccine and address this issue. Ensuring that campaigns are optimally effective is a crucial step toward measles elimination; however, the relationship between campaign impact and disease dynamics is poorly understood. Here, we study measles in Pakistan, and we demonstrate that campaign timing can be tuned to optimally interact with local transmission seasonality and recent incidence history. We develop a mechanistic modeling approach to optimize timing in general high-burden settings, and we find that in Pakistan, hundreds of thousands of infections can be averted with no change in campaign cost.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMeaslesMeasles VaccineModels, StatisticalPakistanTime FactorsMeasles Vaccinemathematical modelmeasles eliminationtime seriesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID31085656
PMCPMC6561209
OpenAlexW2946109903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.