ArticleAnnals of family medicine2019
Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using co-design to develop actionable strategies to identify and follow-up on breast cancer survivors in primary care.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Implementation of the children and young people's health partnership model of paediatric integrated care: a mixed-methods process evaluation.Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Trial
- Factors facilitating the implementation of a clinical decision support system in primary care practices: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Practice-informed implementation: a multi-method approach to map strategies for sustainable tobacco treatment integration within healthcare settings.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Implementation research in Primary Care (Part 2): How to conduct implementation research?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026Review
- A roadmap to scale up person-centred care in the HIV response: recommendations from a global consensus-building process.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Article
- A streamlined approach to classifying and tailoring implementation strategies: recommendations to speed the translation of research to practice.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks - an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Assessing the use of constructs from the consolidated framework for implementation research in U.S. rural cancer screening promotion programs: a systematic search and scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023Review
- Implementation and Qualitative Evaluation of a Primary Care Redesign Model with Expanded Scope of Work for Medical Assistants.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- A framework to support the progressive implementation of integrated team-based care for the management of COPD: a collective case study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Application of community - engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Steps towards implementing evidence-based screening in family medicine in Ukraine: SWOT-analysis of an approach of multidimensional empowerment.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Making It Work: Physicians' Perspectives on the Rapid Transition to Telemedicine.Telemedicine reports · 2021Article
- Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
- Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices.Annals of family medicineArticle
- Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observers of the past 10 to 15 years have witnessed the simultaneous growth of dramatic changes in the practice of primary care and the emergence of a new field of dissemination and implementation science (D&I). Most current implementation science research in primary care assumes practices are not meeting externally derived standards and need external support to meet these demands. After a decade of initiatives, many stakeholders now question the return on their investments. Overall improvements in quality metrics, utilization cost savings, and patient experience have been less than anticipated. While recently conducting a research project in primary care practices, we unexpectedly discovered 3 practices that profoundly shifted our thinking about the sources and directionality of practice change and the underlying assumptions of D&I. Inspired by these practices-along with systems thinking, complexity theory, action research, and the collaborative approaches of community-based participatory research-we propose a reimagining of D&I theory to empower practices. We shift the emphasis regarding the source and direction of change from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.