Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085526›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2019

A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care.

Rebecca S Etz, Stephen J Zyzanski, Martha M Gonzalez, Sarah R Reves, Jonathan P O'Neal, Kurt C Stange

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multilevel Conceptualization and Measurement of Person-Centeredness.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Nursing Home Clinician Survey to Explain Gabapentinoid Increases.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca S EtzLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good rebecca.etz@vcuhealth.org.
Stephen J ZyzanskiCenter for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Martha M GonzalezLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good.
Sarah R RevesLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good.
Jonathan P O'NealLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good.
Kurt C StangeLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and evaluate a concise measure of primary care that is grounded in the experience of patients, clinicians, and health care payers.

methodsWe asked crowd-sourced samples of 412 patients, 525 primary care clinicians, and 85 health care payers to describe what provides value in primary care, then asked 70 primary care and health services experts in a 2½ day international conference to provide additional insights. A multidisciplinary team conducted a qualitative analysis of the combined data to develop a parsimonious set of patient-reported items. We evaluated items using factor analysis, Rasch modeling, and association analyses among 2 online samples and 4 clinical samples from diverse patient populations.

resultsThe resulting person-centered primary care measure parsimoniously represents the broad scope of primary care, with 11 domains each represented by a single item: accessibility, advocacy, community context, comprehensiveness, continuity, coordination, family context, goal-oriented care, health promotion, integration, and relationship. Principal axes factor analysis identified a single factor. Factor loadings and corrected item-total correlations were >0.6 in online samples (n = 2,229) and >0.5 in clinical samples (n = 323). Factor scores were fairly normally distributed in online patient samples, and skewed toward higher ratings in point-of-care patient samples. Rasch models showed a broad spread of person and item scores, acceptable item-fit statistics, and little item redundancy. Preliminary concurrent validity analyses supported hypothesized associations.

conclusionsThe person-centered primary care measure reliably, comprehensively, and parsimoniously assesses the aspects of care thought to represent high-value primary care by patients, clinicians, and payers. The measure is ready for further validation and outcome analyses, and for use in focusing attention on what matters about primary care, while reducing measurement burden.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultmeasurementmetricspopulation healthprimary carequality

Identifiers

PMID31085526
PMCPMC6827628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.