Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085425›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2019

Neglected treasures in the wild - legume wild relatives in food security and human health.

Hengyou Zhang, Farida Yasmin, Bao-Hua Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The COBRA-Like9 from Glycine tabacina enhanced salt tolerance in cultivated soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hengyou ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Farida YasminDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Bao-Hua SongDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. Electronic address: bsong5@uncc.edu.

Funding

Molecular basis and evolution of complex trait variation with significance in human healthR15GM122029 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI SONG, BAO-HUA · 2016 to 2016
$439k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM122029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The legume family (Fabaceae) is the third-largest flowering family with over 18 000 species worldwide that are rich in proteins, oils, and nutrients. However, the production potential of legume-derived food cannot meet increasing global demand. Wild legumes represent a large group of wild species adaptive to diverse habitats and harbor rich genetic diversity for the improvement of the agronomic, nutritional, and medicinal values of the domesticated legumes. Accumulating evidence suggests that the genetic variation retained in these under-exploited leguminous wild relatives can be used to improve crop yield, nutrient contents, and resistance/tolerance to environmental stresses via the integration of omics, genetics, and genome-editing technologies.

Indexed as

FabaceaeFood SupplyHumansStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID31085425
PMCPMC6817337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.