Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31085341›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2019

Gene Expression Profiling of Lung Atypical Carcinoids and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Identifies Three Transcriptomic Subtypes with Specific Genomic Alterations.

Michele Simbolo, Stefano Barbi, Matteo Fassan, Andrea Mafficini, Greta Ali, Caterina Vicentini, Nicola Sperandio, Vincenzo Corbo, Borislav Rusev, Luca Mastracci and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Menin in Cancer.Genes · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michele SimboloDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano BarbiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Matteo FassanARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea MafficiniARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Greta AliDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, AOU Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Caterina VicentiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Nicola SperandioDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Vincenzo CorboDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Borislav RusevARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Luca MastracciDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Genoa and IRCCS S. Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Federica GrilloDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Genoa and IRCCS S. Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Sara PilottoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe PelosiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, and Inter-Hospital Pathology Division, IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan, Italy.
Serena PelliccioniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, AOU Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Rita T LawlorARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giampaolo TortoraDepartment of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Sacred Hearth Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Gabriella FontaniniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, AOU Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Marco VolanteDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin at San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomical Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: aldo.scarpa@univr.it.
Emilio BriaComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Sacred Hearth Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITMultiMedica · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDNA mutational profiling showed that atypical carcinoids (ACs) share alterations with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs). Transcriptomic studies suggested that LCNECs are composed of two subtypes, one of which shares molecular anomalies with SCLC. The missing piece of information is the transcriptomic relationship between ACs and LCNECs, as a direct comparison is lacking in the literature.

methodsTranscriptomic and genomic alterations were investigated by next-generation sequencing in a discovery set of 14 ACs and 14 LCNECs and validated on 21 ACs and 18 LCNECs by using custom gene panels and immunohistochemistry for Men1 and Rb1.

resultsA 58-gene signature distinguished three transcriptional clusters. Cluster 1 comprised 20 LCNECs and one AC harboring concurrent inactivation of tumor protein p53 gene (TP53) and retinoblastoma 1 gene (RB1) in the absence of menin 1 gene (MEN1) mutations; all cases lacked Rb1 nuclear immunostaining. Cluster 3 included 20 ACs and four LCNECs lacking RB1 alterations and having frequent MEN1 (37.5%) and TP53 mutations (16.7%); menin nuclear immunostaining was lost in 75% of cases. Cluster 2 included 14 ACs and eight LCNECs showing intermediate features: TP53, 40.9%; MEN1, 22.7%; and RB1, 18.2%. Patients in cluster C1 had a shorter cancer-specific survival than did patients in C2 or C3.

conclusionsACs and LCNECs comprise three different and clinically relevant molecular diseases, one AC-enriched group in which MEN1 inactivation plays a major role, one LCNEC-enriched group whose hallmark is RB1 inactivation, and one mixed group with intermediate molecular features. These data support a progression of malignancy that may be traced by using combined molecular and immunohistochemical analysis.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoid TumorCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleTranscriptomeAtypical carcinoidGene expression profilingLarge cell neuroendocrine carcinomaLung neuroendocrine tumorsNext-generation sequencingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31085341
OpenAlexW2944477537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.