Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31084617›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2019

The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines.

Angélica M Claudino, Kathleen M Pike, Phillipa Hay, Jared W Keeley, Spencer C Evans, Tahilia J Rebello, Rachel Bryant-Waugh, Yunfei Dai, Min Zhao, Chihiro Matsumoto and 11 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Barriers and Facilitators to ARFID Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Rapid Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Glucose and Loss of Control Eating: Evidence From Naturalistic Assessment After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eating disorders and the incel community.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Scientific validation of the ICD-11 CDDR.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Angélica M ClaudinoDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Major Maragliano, 241, São Paulo, SP, 04017-030, Brazil. amclaudino@gmail.com.
Kathleen M PikeDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Unit 9 Room 5808, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA. kmp2@cumc.columbia.edu.
Phillipa HayTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751, NSW Campbelltown, Australia.
Jared W KeeleyDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin St, Box 842018, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Spencer C EvansDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St, 1040 William James Hall, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Tahilia J RebelloGlobal Mental Health Program, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th, Floor R2, R-233, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rachel Bryant-WaughFeeding and Eating Disorders Service, Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Yunfei DaiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Min ZhaoShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Chihiro MatsumotoNational Study Coordinator for ICD-11 Field Studies, ICD-11 Committee, Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology, Hongo-Yumicho Building, 2-38-4, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Cecile Rausch HerscoviciInternational Life Sciences Institute (ILSI, Argentina), J. Salguero 2745, Buenos Aires, 1425, CABA, Argentina.
Blanca Mellor-MarsáDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental, 2ª Planta Norte, Calle del Prof Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Anne-Claire StonaMinistry for Solidarity and Health, Avenue Duquesne, 75350, Paris, France.
Cary S KoganSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier, Vanier Hall, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Howard F AndrewsDepartments of Biostatistics and Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Unit 47, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Palmiero MonteleoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
David Joseph PilonNova Scotia Health Authority, Dalhousie University, LeMarchant Place, 2nd Floor, Rm 2121, 1246 LeMarchant Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Cornelia ThielsDepartment of Social Studies, University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, Kissinger Str. 14, D-12157, Berlin, Germany.
Pratap SharanDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Samir Al-AdawiDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 35, P.C. 123, Al Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Geoffrey M ReedDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is used globally by 194 WHO member nations. It is used for assigning clinical diagnoses, providing the framework for reporting public health data, and to inform the organization and reimbursement of health services. Guided by overarching principles of increasing clinical utility and global applicability, the 11th revision of the ICD proposes major changes that incorporate empirical advances since the previous revision in 1992. To test recommended changes in the Mental, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, multiple vignette-based case-controlled field studies have been conducted which examine clinicians' ability to accurately and consistently use the new guidelines and assess their overall clinical utility. This manuscript reports on the results from the study of the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for feeding and eating disorders (FEDs).

methodParticipants were 2288 mental health professionals registered with WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network. The study was conducted in Chinese, English, French, Japanese, and Spanish. Clinicians were randomly assigned to apply either the ICD-11 or ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for FEDs to a pair of case vignettes designed to test specific clinical questions. Clinicians selected the diagnosis they thought was correct for each vignette, evaluated the presence of each essential feature of the selected diagnosis, and the clinical utility of the diagnostic guidelines.

resultsThe proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines significantly improved accuracy for all FEDs tested relative to ICD-10 and attained higher clinical utility ratings; similar results were obtained across all five languages. The inclusion of binge eating disorder and avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder reduced the use of residual diagnoses. Areas needing further refinement were identified.

conclusionsThe proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines consistently outperformed ICD-10 in distinguishing cases of eating disorders and showed global applicability and appropriate clinical utility. These results suggest that the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for FEDs will help increase accuracy of public health data, improve clinical diagnosis, and enhance health service organization and provision. This is the first time in the revision of the ICD that data from large-scale, empirical research examining proposed guidelines is completed in time to inform the final diagnostic guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultBinge-Eating DisorderCase-Control StudiesFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'World Health OrganizationAnorexia nervosaAvoidant-restrictive food intake disorderBinge eating disorderBulimia nervosaClinical utilityDiagnosis and classificationEating disordersFeeding disordersICD-11International classification of diseases

Identifiers

PMID31084617
PMCPMC6515596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.