Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31084544›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A Propensity Score Analysis.

Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot, Guillaume Piessen, Vahan Kepenekian, Evelyne Decullier, Marc Pocard, Bernard Meunier, Jean-Marc Bereder, Karine Abboud, Frédéric Marchal, François Quenet and 16 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 229 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
39.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04522011 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficiency Between Intraoperative and Postoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Docetaxel Combine Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsStomach Neoplasms, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyArmsintraoperative or postoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
NCT05648487 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Combined With Sintilimab in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAffiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled46ConditionsGastric CancerArmsHIPEC,anti-PD-1 antibody Sintilimab (Tyvyt®), Chemotherapy,Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Deubiquitinase USP48 Promotes Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis by Stabilizing S100A9 to Drive Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Formation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Guillaume Piessen3CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Vahan Kepenekian1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Evelyne Decullier4Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Marc Pocard5Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Bernard Meunier6CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Jean-Marc Bereder7CHU L'Archet, Nice, France.
Karine Abboud8CHU St Étienne, St Étienne, France.
Frédéric Marchal9Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
François Quenet10Centre Val D'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Diane Goere11Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Simon Msika12CHU Louis Mourier, Paris, France.
Catherine Arvieux13CHU La Tronche, Grenoble, France.
Nicolas Pirro14CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Romuald Wernert15Institut Paul Papin, Angers, France.
Patrick Rat16CHU Le Bocage, Dijon, France.
Johan Gagnière17CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jeremie H Lefevre18Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Thomas Courvoisier19CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Reza Kianmanesh20CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Delphine Vaudoyer1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Michel Rivoire21Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Pierre Meeus21Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Guillaume Passot1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Olivier Glehen1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
FREGAT and BIG-RENAPE Networks
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRCEA Valduc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRHôpital Louis-Mourier · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Paul Bocuse · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) is a poor prognostic evolution. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) yields promising results, but the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. Here we aimed to compare outcomes between CRS-HIPEC versus CRS alone (CRSa) among patients with PMs from GC. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom prospective databases, we identified 277 patients with PMs from GC who were treated with complete CRS with curative intent (no residual nodules > 2.5 mm) at 19 French centers from 1989 to 2014. Of these patients, 180 underwent CRS-HIPEC and 97 CRSa. Tumor burden was assessed using the peritoneal cancer index. A Cox proportional hazards regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity score was used to assess the effect of HIPEC and account for confounding factors.

resultsAfter IPTW adjustment, the groups were similar, except that median peritoneal cancer index remained higher in the CRS-HIPEC group (6

conclusionCompared with CRSa, CRS-HIPEC improved OS and recurrence-free survival, without additional morbidity or mortality. When complete CRS is possible, CRS-HIPEC may be considered a valuable therapy for strictly selected patients with limited PMs from GC.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31084544
OpenAlexW2945459534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.