Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31083977›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2019

Understanding Cell Penetration of Cyclic Peptides.

Patrick G Dougherty, Ashweta Sahni, Dehua Pei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 224 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrick G DoughertyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The Ohio State University , 484 West 12th Avenue , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.
Ashweta SahniDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The Ohio State University , 484 West 12th Avenue , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.
Dehua PeiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The Ohio State University , 484 West 12th Avenue , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-6934

Funding

Development of Cell-Permeable Peptides and ProteinsR35GM122459 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Dehua Pei · 2017 to 2026
$5.1M
Diagnosis of non-polypoid neoplasia of the colon with CT colonographyR03CA139600 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YOSHIDA, HIROYUKI · 2009 to 2010
$177k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA139600NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 75% of all disease-relevant human proteins, including those involved in intracellular protein-protein interactions (PPIs), are undruggable with the current drug modalities (i.e., small molecules and biologics). Macrocyclic peptides provide a potential solution to these undruggable targets because their larger sizes (relative to conventional small molecules) endow them the capability of binding to flat PPI interfaces with antibody-like affinity and specificity. Powerful combinatorial library technologies have been developed to routinely identify cyclic peptides as potent, specific inhibitors against proteins including PPI targets. However, with the exception of a very small set of sequences, the vast majority of cyclic peptides are impermeable to the cell membrane, preventing their application against intracellular targets. This Review examines common structural features that render most cyclic peptides membrane impermeable, as well as the unique features that allow the minority of sequences to enter the cell interior by passive diffusion, endocytosis/endosomal escape, or other mechanisms. We also present the current state of knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of cell penetration, the various strategies for designing cell-permeable, biologically active cyclic peptides against intracellular targets, and the assay methods available to quantify their cell-permeability.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell MembraneCell-Penetrating PeptidesDiffusionDrug DesignEndocytosisEndosomesHumansPeptides, CyclicPlantsProtein ConformationProtein TransportCell-Penetrating PeptidesPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID31083977
PMCPMC6739158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.