Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31083783›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2019

Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shoji Kimura, Takehiro Iwata, Beat Foerster, Nicola Fossati, Alberto Briganti, Yasutomo Nasu, Shin Egawa, Mohammad Abufaraj, Shahrokh F Shariat

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Health-related quality of life overview after different curative treatment options in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an umbrella review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Shoji KimuraDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Takehiro IwataDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Beat FoersterDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicola FossatiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Yasutomo NasuDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Shin EgawaDepartment of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATOkayama University · JPIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITJikei University School of Medicine · JPKantonsspital Winterthur · CHVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare postoperative complications and health-related quality of life of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with those of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy. A systematic search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A pooled meta-analysis was carried out to assess the differences between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy according to randomized and non-randomized comparative studies, respectively. We identified six randomized comparative studies and 31 non-randomized comparative studies. Most robot-assisted radical cystectomy patients were treated with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with longer operative times, and lower blood loss and transfusion rates compared with open radical cystectomy in both randomized comparative studies and non-randomized comparative studies. There was no significant difference between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy in the rate of patients with any or major complications within 90 days both in randomized comparative studies and non-randomized comparative studies. Non-randomized comparative studies reported a lower rate of complications at 30 days, mortality at 90 days and length of stay for patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy, which were not confirmed in randomized comparative studies. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative quality of life score assessment at 3 and 6 months between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is associated with less blood loss and lower transfusion rates. There is no difference in complications, length of stay, mortality, and quality of life between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy. Data from non-randomized comparative studies favor perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy patients, the failure to confirm in randomized comparative studies, likely due to bias in study design and reporting. Further randomized comparative studies comparing postoperative complications and quality of life between robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy are required to assess potential differences between these two surgical approaches.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionCystectomyHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRisk FactorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Diversionhealth-related quality of lifemeta-analysisopen radical cystectomypostoperative complicationrobot-assisted radical cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID31083783
PMCPMC6851708
OpenAlexW2945244786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.