Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31083681›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Experiences and views of older people on their participation in a nurse-led health promotion intervention: "Community Health Consultation Offices for Seniors".

Anne Esther Marcus-Varwijk, Dónya S Madjdian, Emely de Vet, Monique W M Mensen, Tommy L S Visscher, Adelita V Ranchor, Joris P J Slaets, Carolien H M Smits

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Older people living at home: experiences of healthy ageing.Primary health care research & development · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Esther Marcus-VarwijkResearch Group Innovating with Older Adults, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-3964
Dónya S MadjdianResearch Group Innovating with Older Adults, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Emely de VetChair group Strategic Communication, Sub-department of Communication, Philosophy and Technology: Centre for Integrative Development, Wageningen University, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Monique W M MensenResearch Group Innovating with Older Adults, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Tommy L S VisscherResearch Group for Healthy Cities, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Adelita V RanchorHealth Psychology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joris P J SlaetsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M SmitsResearch Group Innovating with Older Adults, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing number of community-dwelling older adults and the increased risks of adverse health events that accompany ageing, call for health promotion interventions. Nurses often lead these interventions. The views and experiences of older adults participating in these interventions have rarely been studied. To understand the views of targeted older adults, qualitative studies are essential. The aim of this study was to investigate the views and experiences of older adults on their participation in a nurse-led intervention, taking into account their views on healthy aging.

methodsIn a qualitative study, nineteen Dutch older adults aged 62 to 92 years participated in semi-structured interviews. These were transcribed verbatim and coded with the Qualitative Data Analysis Miner software program. The Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven was used for data analysis.

resultsBased on the analysis of the interviews, the following main themes emerged from the data reflecting the experiences of the participants: 1) awareness of aging, 2) experienced interaction with the nurse, and 3) perception of the consultations as a check-up and/or personal support.

conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of nurse-led interventions that match older adults' personal views concerning healthy living, and their views and experiences concerning these interventions. Older adults' holistic views of healthy living were not always assessed and valued by the nurses. Also, our study shows a wide variety of expectations, views and experiences among the participating older adults. This implies that health professionals should adjust their working and communication methods to the older adult's views on life.

Indexed as

Health PromotionIndependent LivingNursesPublic HealthReferral and ConsultationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31083681
PMCPMC6513064
OpenAlexW2945876362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.