ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Severe Complications after Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolution of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Applications and Clinical Implications.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Predictors of same-day discharge following bariatric surgery using machine learning.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in obesity management: clinical evidence, translational gaps, and implementation priorities-a structured narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Optimizing Personalized Decision-Making, Predictive Monitoring, and Postoperative Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Application of Machine Learning to Predict Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Integrating Machine Learning and Dynamic Digital Follow-up for Enhanced Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation Management During ECMO: Narrative Review.JHLT open · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Bariatric Surgery Complications: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Predicting pregnancy at the first year following metabolic-bariatric surgery: development and validation of machine learning models.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the impact of siren noise exposure on cognitive function and mental health among firefighters.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advanced Non-linear Modeling and Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Predicting 30-Day Complications in Bariatric Surgery: A Single-Center Study.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Care: Opportunities and Challenges.Anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Model in Obesity to Predict Weight Loss One Year after Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Predicting short-term thromboembolic risk following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using supervised machine learning.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Relationships between job stress, post-traumatic stress and musculoskeletal symptoms in firefighters and the role of job burnout and depression mediators: a bayesian network model.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Machine learning prediction of major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Machine learning perioperative applications in visceral surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Prediction of the Fatal Acute Complications of Myocardial Infarction via Machine Learning Algorithms.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere obesity is a global public health threat of growing proportions. Accurate models to predict severe postoperative complications could be of value in the preoperative assessment of potential candidates for bariatric surgery. So far, traditional statistical methods have failed to produce high accuracy. We aimed to find a useful machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the risk for severe complication after bariatric surgery.
methodsWe trained and compared 29 supervised ML algorithms using information from 37,811 patients that operated with a bariatric surgical procedure between 2010 and 2014 in Sweden. The algorithms were then tested on 6250 patients operated in 2015. We performed the synthetic minority oversampling technique tackling the issue that only 3% of patients experienced severe complications.
resultsMost of the ML algorithms showed high accuracy (>90%) and specificity (>90%) in both the training and test data. However, none of the algorithms achieved an acceptable sensitivity in the test data. We also tried to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms to maximize sensitivity, but did not yet identify one with a high enough sensitivity that can be used in clinical praxis in bariatric surgery. However, a minor, but perceptible, improvement in deep neural network (NN) ML was found.
conclusionIn predicting the severe postoperative complication among the bariatric surgery patients, ensemble algorithms outperform base algorithms. When compared to other ML algorithms, deep NN has the potential to improve the accuracy and it deserves further investigation. The oversampling technique should be considered in the context of imbalanced data where the number of the interested outcome is relatively small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.