Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31083462›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Human Liver Regeneration: An Etiology Dependent Process.

Matthias Van Haele, Janne Snoeck, Tania Roskams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Using different zebrafish models to explore liver regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Update on Hepatobiliary Plasticity.Seminars in liver disease · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Cell Sources and Influencing Factors of Liver Regeneration: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Review
  17. Liver Regeneration after Hepatectomy and Partial Liver Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias Van HaeleDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Translational Cell and Tissue Research, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. matthias.vanhaele@uzleuven.be.
Janne SnoeckDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Translational Cell and Tissue Research, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. janne.snoeck@student.kuleuven.be.
Tania RoskamsDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Translational Cell and Tissue Research, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. tania.roskams@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of the liver has been an interesting and well-investigated topic for many decades. This etiology and time-dependent mechanism has proven to be extremely challenging to investigate, certainly in human diseases. A reason for this challenge is found in the numerous interactions of different cell components, of which some are even only temporarily present (e.g., inflammatory cells). To orchestrate regeneration of the epithelial cells, their interaction with the non-epithelial components is of utmost importance. Hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, liver progenitor cells, and peribiliary glands have proven to be compartments of regeneration. The ductular reaction is a common denominator in virtually all liver diseases; however, it is predominantly found in late-stage hepatic and biliary diseases. Ductular reaction is an intriguing example of interplay between epithelial and non-epithelial cells and encompasses bipotential liver progenitor cells which are able to compensate for the loss of the exhausted hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in biliary and hepatocytic liver diseases. In this manuscript, we focus on the etiology-specific damage that is observed in different human diseases and how the liver regulates the regenerative response in an acute and chronic setting. Furthermore, we describe the importance of morphological keynotes in different etiologies and how spatial information is of relevance for every basic and translational research of liver regeneration.

Indexed as

Biliary TractCarcinogenesisHepatectomyHepatocytesHumansLiver DiseasesLiver Regenerationacute liver damagechronic liver damageductular reactionhuman liver diseasesliver carcinogenesisliver progenitor cellliver regeneration

Identifiers

PMID31083462
PMCPMC6539121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.