ArticleMedicine2019
Reduced rate of dehiscence after implementation of a novel technique for creating colonic anastomosis in pediatric patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis in a single institute.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the new continuous horizontal mattress anastomosis for pediatric patients who underwent emergency or electively laparotomy.From June 2012 to June 2017, 858 patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis were reviewed retrospectively, including 369 patients with the new continuous horizontal mattress anastomosis and 489 patients with traditional 2 layer interrupted anastomosis, served as control. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for selected baseline variables. The primary outcome, anastomosis complications and clinical outcomes, including postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, overall expenditure, and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups.Patients with the new manual anastomosis had advantageous postoperative outcomes than those with the traditional 2 layer interrupted anastomosis. A mean of 11.4 minutes was required to construct the new manual single-layer anastomosis versus 18.5 minutes for the traditional anastomosis (P < .001). A reduction trend for postoperative anastomotic complications was indicated in patients receiving horizontal mattress anastomosis (odds ratio [OD] (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.56 (0.37-0.84); P = .004), including peritonitis or abscess (OD [95% CI], 0.56 (0.32-0.98); P = .026), anastomotic leakage (OD [95% CI], 0.39 [0.12-1.27]; P = .088), and anastomotic strictures (P = .26). Mean length of stay was 10.9 ± 2.9 days for the new manual anastomosis group and 11.3 ± 3.5 days for traditional 2-layer anastomosis patients (P = .12).Beneficial effects of the new manual anastomosis were demonstrated in terms of anastomotic complications, and length of hospital stay in the pediatric patients. Furthermore, it is a novel, feasible and safe method that may simplify the surgical procedure in anastomoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.