Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31083189›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

A verification of the application of the non-derivatized mass spectrometry method in newborns screening of metabolic disorders.

Yulan Zheng, Yao Chen, Xiaolong Qiu, Weifen Chen, Qingying Lin, Yinglin Zeng, Hong Zhao, Wenbin Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yulan ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy.
Yao ChenNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaolong QiuNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Weifen ChenNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Qingying LinNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yinglin ZengNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hong ZhaoNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wenbin ZhuNeonatal Screening Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is required that the clinical screening of metabolic disorders in newborns meet International Organization for Standardization 15189-2012 approval. The new tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) based screening system and its companion reagent should be independently authenticated before their implementation in clinical diagnosis laboratories.Linearity, stability, accuracy, and precision evaluations were carried out to verify the performance of the Waters ACQUITY TQD MS/MS system with the NeoBase non-derivatized MS/MS PerkinElmer kit for detecting amino acids and acylcarnitine in newborns with metabolic disorders.Statistically, the correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9982 to 0.9999 indicates good linearity. The measurements at the beginning and end of the reagent storage procedure were taken for stability verification. No significant difference was detected between the 2 periods. The amino acid exhibited a degree of bias in the range of 0% to 14.17%, with acylcarnitine's being was in the range of 0% to 14.84%; they consequently passed the quality assessment requirements for clinical laboratories of the China National Centre. The amino acids' within-run, between-run, and day-to-day run precision were 1.19% to 7.68%, 1.63% to 5.01%, and 4.77% to 12.48%, respectively, while the total imprecision was 5.55% to 13.33%. Acylcarnitine's within-run, between-run, and day-to-day run precision was 1.2% to 8.43%, 0.19% to 9.60%, and 2.33% to 10.74%, respectively, while it's total imprecision was 6.57% to 13.99%. The manufacturer declared that the total imprecision of the tests, using Multiple Reaction Monitoring, should be less than or equal to 25% of the coefficient of variation for the kit's high and low-quality control levels.The performance of the non-derivatized MS/MS screening system in detecting the amino acids and acylcarnitines passed the test's requirements. It was maintained in accordance with the routine clinical chemical detection system.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornMass SpectrometryMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsNeonatal Screening

Identifiers

PMID31083189
PMCPMC6531236
OpenAlexW2945897013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.