ArticlePsychosomatic medicine
Blended Collaborative Care to Treat Heart Failure and Comorbid Depression: Rationale and Study Design of the Hopeful Heart Trial.
Article in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02044211 (Blended Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Co-Morbid Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blended Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Co-Morbid Depression
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial predictors of health behavior adherence in heart-failure patients with comorbid depression: a secondary analysis of the Hopeful Heart trial.BMC psychology · 2024Trial
- Perceptions of Need for Palliative Care in Recently Hospitalized Patients With Systolic Heart Failure.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Trial
- Depression Subtypes in Systolic Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryTrial
- Feasibility and acceptability of a rural palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure (RuPAL-HF).BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- "If I have any problems, I just want to see my [primary care] doctor": perspectives on a proposed collaborative RUral PALliative care intervention (RuPal).BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Adapting and Implementing a Blended Collaborative Care Intervention for Older Adults with Multimorbidity: Quantitative and Qualitative Results from the ESCAPE Pilot Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Systematic Review of Telehealth Delivery Models, Intervention Content, and Outcomes in Heart Failure Care.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
- Healthcare needs in elderly patients with chronic heart failure in view of a personalized blended collaborative care intervention: a cross sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Care manager role for older multimorbid heart failure patients' needs in relation to psychological distress and quality of life: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Integrated care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: protocol for the ESCAPE randomized trial and cohort study.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Needs of multimorbid heart failure patients and their carers: a qualitative interview study and the creation of personas as a basis for a blended collaborative care intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic implications of a one-item health literacy screen on health status outcomes among heart failure patients with depression.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Effects of Metoprolol Succinate Combined with Entresto on Cardiac Function Indexes and Coagulation Function in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Improving Quality of Life in Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Article
- Efficacy of team-based collaborative care for distressed patients in secondary prevention of chronic coronary heart disease (TEACH): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Economic Evaluations of Health Service Interventions Targeting Patients with Multimorbidities: A Scoping Literature Review.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite numerous improvements in care, morbidity from heart failure (HF) has remained essentially unchanged in recent years. One potential reason is that depression, which is comorbid in approximately 40% of hospitalized HF patients and associated with adverse HF outcomes, often goes unrecognized and untreated. The Hopeful Heart Trial is the first study to evaluate whether a widely generalizable telephone-delivered collaborative care program for treating depression in HF patients improves clinical outcomes.
methodsThe Hopeful Heart Trial aimed to enroll 750 patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (ejection fraction ≤ 45%) including the following: (A) 625 patients who screened positive for depression both during their hospitalization (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-2]) and two weeks following discharge (PHQ-9 ≥ 10); and (B) 125 non-depressed control patients (PHQ-2(-)/PHQ-9 < 5). We randomized depressed patients to either their primary care physician's "usual care" (UC) or to one of two nurse-delivered 12-month collaborative care programs for (a) depression and HFrEF ("blended") or (b) HrEFF alone (enhanced UC). Our co-primary hypotheses will test whether "blended" care can improve mental health-related quality of life versus UC and versus enhanced UC, respectively, on the Mental Component Summary of the Short-Form 12 Health Survey. Secondary hypotheses will evaluate the effectiveness of our interventions on mood, functional status, hospital readmissions, deaths, provision of evidence-based care for HFrEF, and treatment costs.
resultsNot applicable.
conclusionsThe Hopeful Heart Trial will determine whether "blended" collaborative care for depression and HFrEF is more effective at improving patient-relevant outcomes than collaborative care for HFrEF alone or doctors' UC for HFrEF.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02044211.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.