ArticleJournal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention2019
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY.
Article in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing and delivering a hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Phase II exercise program during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quality improvement program.BMJ open quality · 2023Trial
- Personalized smart voice-based electronic prescription for remote at-home feedback management in cardiovascular disease rehabilitation: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2023Trial
- Cardiac rehabilitation coverage and program characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean: Comparisons from the ICCPR's 2025 Global Audit Update.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2026Article
- Digital Health Use and Interest in Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Cardiac Inpatients: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of internet based cardiac rehabilitation program for management of patients with chronic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Official proceeding from the 2025 ITACARE-P National Meeting, Rome, October 21-22 2025: The added value of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in heart failure management: clinical scenarios and expert opinion from a centres network of the Italian Alliance for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Prevention (ITACARE-P).International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Are clinical improvements in anxiety or depression associated with improvement in walking fitness following a cardiac rehabilitation programme?Open heart · 2026Observational
- Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Socially Vulnerable Communities.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Exploring the experiences and rehabilitation needs of patients with coronary artery diseases: an effort to design a contextual home-based cardiac rehabilitation through a qualitative enquiry.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Opportunities and Barriers in Telerehabilitation for Coronary Bypass Patients: A Case Study from the Faroe Islands.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- Overcoming challenges to optimize the clinical and financial benefits of in-home rehabilitation services.The American journal of managed care · 2025Article
- Needs and Constraints for Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Within a Community-Based Setting: A Study Based on Focus Group Interviews.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Community-Level Distress and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation, Facility Access, and Clinical Outcomes After Inpatient Coronary Revascularization.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
- Participation and Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Big-Data Study of the Korean National Health Insurance Service.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Review
- Identifying Factors for Low-Risk Participation in Alternative Cardiac Rehabilitation Models for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Using MI'S SCOREPAD.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2023Review
- A Structured Review of Commercially Available Cardiac Rehabilitation mHealth Applications Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2022Article
- Physical activity, exercise and fitness for prevention and treatment of heart failure.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
- Cognition and Exercise: GENERAL OVERVIEW AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CARDIAC REHABILITATION.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2021Article
- Current Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Centers in Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention that uses patient education, health behavior modification, and exercise training to improve secondary prevention outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. CR programs reduce morbidity and mortality rates in adults with ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or cardiac surgery but are significantly underused, with only a minority of eligible patients participating in CR in the United States. New delivery strategies are urgently needed to improve participation. One potential strategy is home-based CR (HBCR). In contrast to center-based CR services, which are provided in a medically supervised facility, HBCR relies on remote coaching with indirect exercise supervision and is provided mostly or entirely outside of the traditional center-based setting. Although HBCR has been successfully deployed in the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries, most US healthcare organizations have little to no experience with such programs. The purpose of this scientific statement is to identify the core components, efficacy, strengths, limitations, evidence gaps, and research necessary to guide the future delivery of HBCR in the United States. Previous randomized trials have generated low- to moderate-strength evidence that HBCR and center-based CR can achieve similar improvements in 3- to 12-month clinical outcomes. Although HBCR appears to hold promise in expanding the use of CR to eligible patients, additional research and demonstration projects are needed to clarify, strengthen, and extend the HBCR evidence base for key subgroups, including older adults, women, underrepresented minority groups, and other higher-risk and understudied groups. In the interim, we conclude that HBCR may be a reasonable option for selected clinically stable low- to moderate-risk patients who are eligible for CR but cannot attend a traditional center-based CR program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.