Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31081924›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

A Randomized Trial of Combined tDCS Over Right Inferior Frontal Cortex and Cognitive Bias Modification: Null Effects on Drinking and Alcohol Approach Bias.

Eric D Claus, Stefan D Klimaj, Roberta Chavez, Amber D Martinez, Vincent P Clark

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric D ClausThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1800-0813
Stefan D KlimajThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Roberta ChavezCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addiction, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Amber D MartinezCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addiction, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Vincent P ClarkThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Modifying Alcohol Approach Motivations with tDCS and Cognitive RetrainingR21AA021201 · NIAAA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CLAUS, ERIC D · 2013 to 2014
$444k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA021201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeriving novel treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is of critical importance, as existing treatments are only modestly effective for reducing drinking. Two promising strategies for treating AUDs include cognitive bias modification (CBM) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). While each strategy has shown positive results in reducing drinking or alcohol-related constructs (e.g., craving), initial tests of the combination of CBM and tDCS have shown mixed results. The present study investigated the degree to which combining CBM and tDCS (2.0 mA anodal current over F10) could reduce alcohol approach biases and alcohol consumption.

methodsSeventy-nine at-risk drinkers were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions in a 2 × 2 factorial design: verum CBM/verum tDCS, verum CBM/sham tDCS, sham CBM/verum tDCS, or sham CBM/sham tDCS. Participants completed a baseline assessment of alcohol approach bias and drinking quantity/frequency (i.e., drinks per drinking day [DDD] and percent heavy drinking days [PHDD]), 4 sessions of combined CBM and tDCS, and follow-up assessments of approach bias and alcohol consumption.

resultsResults indicated that while participants did demonstrate significant alcohol approach biases at baseline, neither CBM, tDCS, nor the interaction reduced the bias at the follow-up. In addition, there was evidence of a trend toward reducing DDD from baseline to the 1-week/1-month follow-ups, but there was no significant effect of the intervention on either DDD or PHDD.

conclusionsThese results partially replicated null results presented in similar CBM/tDCS trials and suggest that this combination, at least with anodal stimulation over dorsolateral or inferior frontal sites, may have limited utility to reduce drinking.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyCravingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMotivationNegative ResultsYoung AdultAlcohol Use DisorderCognitive Bias ModificationImplicit BiasTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31081924
PMCPMC6602850
OpenAlexW2945549504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.