Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31081829›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2019

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in gastric adenocarcinoma patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy.

Juliana M Costa, Bruno Gonçalves, Maria Miguel Gomes, Dália Fernandes, Raquel Gonçalves, João B Soares

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Reflections on surgical management strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gastric cancer in 2022: Is there still a role for endoscopic ultrasound?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  7. Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing invasion depth of early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Setting the stage for research in endoscopy.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana M CostaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Bruno GonçalvesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Maria Miguel GomesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Dália FernandesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Raquel GonçalvesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal.
João B SoaresDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Hospital Braga · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent studies demonstrated the positive impact of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Objective: To assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for neoadjuvant therapy (T ≥ 2 and/or N+). Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with an anatomopathological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2011 and June 2017, who had EUS for staging and underwent surgery as a first therapeutic attempt. The concordance (k) and accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) of EUS for T ≥ 2 and/or N+ were assessed using the anatomopathological staging of the resected surgical specimen as the gold standard. Results: The final sample included 152 patients (66.4% male, 67.1 ± 12.2 years). The concordance, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the EUS for T ≥ 2 and/or N+ were 0.72, 0.86 ± 0.03, 88.5% and 83.1%, respectively. The results were higher in proximal (k = 0.93, AUC = 0.96 ± 0.05, sensitivity (S) = 99.0% and specificity (E) = 90.9%) compared with distal lesions (k = 0.67, AUC = 0.84 ± 0.04, S = 85.7% and E = 81.5%), and in intestinal subtype (k = 0.77, AUC = 0.88 ± 0.04, S = 92.6% and E = 84.1%) compared with diffuse (k = 0.58, AUC = 0.79 ± 0.10, S = 85.0% and E = 72.7%) or mixed-subtype tumours (k = 0.65, AUC = 0.84 ± 0.10, S = 76.9% and E = 90.0%). Conclusion: In one of the largest series of patients, we showed that EUS has overall high agreement and accuracy in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for neoadjuvant therapy, although the agreement and accuracy are greater for proximal and intestinal lesions.

Indexed as

EndosonographyAdenocarcinomaAgedDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStomach NeoplasmsAccuracyendoscopic ultrasoundgastric adenocarcinomaneoadjuvant therapypreoperative staging

Identifiers

PMID31081829
PMCPMC6498790
OpenAlexW2903898117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.