Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31081585›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2019

The World Health Organization trauma checklist versus Trauma Team Time-out: A perspective.

Mark Fitzgerald, Stephanie Reilly, De Villiers Smit, Yesul Kim, Joseph Mathew, Ellaine Boo, Abdulrahman Alqahtani, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Ahamed Darez, Jma Bruno Mascarenhas and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Reducing blood wastage through introduction of a transfusion team.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Simulation versus reality: what can interprofessional simulation teach us about team dynamics in the trauma bay?Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark FitzgeraldTrauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0183-7761
Stephanie ReillyTrauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
De Villiers SmitNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yesul KimNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joseph MathewTrauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ellaine BooNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abdulrahman AlqahtaniTrauma Service, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sharfuddin ChowdhuryTrauma Service, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ahamed DarezTamil Nadu Accident and Emergency Initiative, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.
Jma Bruno MascarenhasTamil Nadu Accident and Emergency Initiative, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-7964
Francis O'KeeffeNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael NoonanTrauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris NicksonIntensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marc MarquezEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wang An LiTrauma Service, Huizhou First Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Yan Ling ZhangTrauma Service, Huizhou First Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Kim WilliamsTrauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Biswadev MitraNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-2450
The Alfred Hospital · AUGovernment of Tamil Nadu · INHuizhou Central People's Hospital · CNKing Saud Medical City · SANational Trauma Research Institute · AUMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IE

Funding

Transport Accident Commission
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-out protocols have reportedly improved team dynamics and patients' safety in various clinical settings - particularly in the operating room. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a Trauma Care checklist, which outlines steps to follow immediately after the primary and secondary surveys and prior to the team leaving the patient. The WHO Trauma Care checklist's main perceived benefit is the prompting of clinicians to complete trauma admissions as per evidence-based guidelines. The WHO Trauma Care checklist, while likely to be successful in reducing errors of omission related to hospital admission, may be limited in its ability to reduce errors that occur in the initial 30 min of trauma reception - when most of the life-saving decisions are made. To address this limitation a Trauma Team Time-out protocol is proposed for initial trauma resuscitation, targeting the critical first 30 min of hospital reception.

Indexed as

ChecklistHumansPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Out, HealthcareWorld Health OrganizationWounds and Injurieschecklistmedical errorresuscitationtime-outtraumatrauma team

Identifiers

PMID31081585
PMCPMC6851662
OpenAlexW2945856797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.