Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080954›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2019

Detecting Major Complications and Death After Emergency Abdominal Surgery Using the Surgical Apgar Score: A Retrospective Analysis in a Caribbean Setting.

Keevan Singh, Seetharaman Hariharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. The Surgical Apgar Score: A Systematic Review of Its Discriminatory Performance.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keevan SinghAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-0063
Seetharaman HariharanAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple 10-point scoring system that has been shown to be predictive of major postoperative complications and death after surgery. We evaluated the predictive ability of this score in a cohort of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in a Caribbean tertiary hospital.

methodsThe SAS was calculated retrospectively from the anaesthesia records of all patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery during a 12-month period. The postoperative surgical records of these patients were then examined for the presence of major complications and death. The association between the SAS and outcomes was tested using binary logistic regression, and the SAS discriminatory ability was determined from the receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis.

resultsOf the 220 patients studied, 72 (33%) suffered an in-hospital major complication or death. The highest complication rate occurred in the low-scoring groups, with 68% of those scoring <4 being affected. Low-scoring patients (<4) had four times the risk of major complications when compared to higher-scoring groups (relative risk [RR], 4.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-7.3; p<0.001). The odds ratio (OR) for major complications or death per unit increase in the SAS was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.47-0.72; p<0.001). The c-statistic of the SAS for predicting major complications or death was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.73; p<0.0001).

conclusionThe SAS is a simple 10-point score that can be used in patients undergoing emergency surgery in a Caribbean setting to help identify those that are at a higher risk of postoperative complications. Due to its ease in calculation, it can be added to other commonly used criteria to help triage the postoperative patient.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiaintensive carerisksurgery

Identifiers

PMID31080954
PMCPMC6499045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.