Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080850›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2019

Determining malignancy in CT guided fine needle aspirate biopsy of subsolid lung nodules: Is core biopsy necessary?

Nantaka Kiranantawat, Shaunagh McDermott, Milena Petranovic, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Ashok Muniappan, Amita Sharma, Jo-Anne O Shepard, Subba R Digumarthy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ground-glass opacities: a problem bound to get more challenging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nantaka KiranantawatDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Shaunagh McDermottDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Milena PetranovicDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Mari Mino-KenudsonDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Ashok MuniappanDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Amita SharmaDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Jo-Anne O ShepardDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Subba R DigumarthyDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the success of determining malignancy in subsolid lung nodules by fine needle aspirate of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy. MATERIAL AND

methodThis IRB approved retrospective study analyzed CTguided transthoracic needle biopsy of 86 consecutive subsolid nodules (size 25 + 14 mm; Age 71 + 10 years: M: F, 27:59), with ground glass opacity of = 50% in 64 (74%) and size < 2 cm in 38 (44%). Fine needle aspirate was performed in all and additional core biopsy in 21 (24%). The biopsy results were correlated with resected surgical pathology in 59 (69%) and by long term clinical and imaging follow-up in 27 (31%). The statistical analysis was performed by Fischer exact test to determine the success rate in < 2cm and =2cm nodules and those with <50% and =50% ground glass opacity.

resultsThe technical success of performing the biopsy was 94.7%. The sensitivity for making a diagnosis of malignancy in small and large subsolid nodules was 88.6 and 95.6% (p=>0.05), with a specificity 100% in both groups. Core biopsy altered the diagnosis only in 1/21 (4.8%). The nondiagnostic biopsy rate was 18 and 11% for lesions with =50% and <50% ground glass opacity (p=>0.05). The incidence of pneumothorax was 21%, none requiring chest tube, and mild hemoptysis in 8%.

conclusionCT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of both small and large subsolid nodules is highly sensitive and very specific for making the diagnosis of malignancy with a low rate of complications. Additional core biopsy offered no significant advantage over fine needle aspirate biopsy alone.

Indexed as

Core biopsyCT guided lung biopsyFine needle aspirateGround glass opacityLung cancerSubsolid nodule

Identifiers

PMID31080850
PMCPMC6502735
OpenAlexW2944310279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.