Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080830›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Limb Spasticity after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Li-Chun Sun, Rong Chen, Chuan Fu, Ying Chen, Qianli Wu, RuiPeng Chen, XueJuan Lin, Sha Luo

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Chun SunDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
Rong ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-6766
Chuan FuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
Qianli WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
RuiPeng ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
XueJuan LinDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
Sha LuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570102, China.
Hainan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInconsistent data have been reported for the effectiveness of intramuscular botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in patients with limb spasticity after stroke. This meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of BTXA in adult patients with upper and lower limb spasticity after stroke.

methodsAn electronic search was performed to select eligible RCTs in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library through December 2018. Summary standard mean differences (SMDs) and relative risk (RR) values with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to assess effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively.

resultsTwenty-seven RCTs involving a total of 2,793 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 16 and 9 trials assessing upper and lower limb spasticity cases, respectively. For upper limb spasticity, BTXA therapy significantly improved the levels of muscle tone (SMD=-0.76; 95% CI -0.97 to -0.55; P<0.001), physician global assessment (SMD=0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.67; P<0.001), and disability assessment scale (SMD=-0.30; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.20; P<0.001), with no significant effects on active upper limb function (SMD=0.49; 95% CI -0.08 to 1.07; P=0.093) and adverse events (RR=1.18; 95% CI 0.72-1.93; P=0.509). For lower limb spasticity, BTXA therapy was associated with higher Fugl-Meyer score (SMD=5.09; 95%CI 2.16-8.01; P=0.001), but had no significant effects on muscle tone (SMD=-0.12; 95% CI -0.83 to 0.59; P=0.736), gait speed (SMD=0.06; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.15; P=0.116), and adverse events (RR=1.01; 95% CI 0.71-1.45; P=0.949).

conclusionsBTXA improves muscle tone, physician global assessment, and disability assessment scale in upper limb spasticity and increases the Fugl-Meyer score in lower limb spasticity.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AExtremitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityMuscle TonusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type A

Identifiers

PMID31080830
PMCPMC6475544
OpenAlexW2934253898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.