Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080743›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2019

Role of nanostructures in improvising oral medicine.

Shatadal Ghosh, Sumit Ghosh, Parames C Sil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shatadal GhoshDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, P-1/12, CIT Scheme VII M, Calcutta, 700054, West Bengal, India.
Sumit GhoshDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, P-1/12, CIT Scheme VII M, Calcutta, 700054, West Bengal, India.
Parames C SilDivision of Molecular Medicine, Bose Institute, P-1/12, CIT Scheme VII M, Calcutta, 700054, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most preferable mode of drugs administration is via the oral route but physiological barriers such as pH, enzymatic degradation etc. limit the absolute use of this route. Herein lies the importance of nanotechnology having a wide range of applications in the field of nano-medicine, particularly in drug delivery systems. The exclusive properties particularly small size and high surface area (which can be modified as required), exhibited by these nanoparticlesrender these structures more suitable for the purpose of drug delivery. Various nanostructures, like liposomes, dendrimers, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, etc. have been designed for the said purpose. These nanostructures have several advantages over traditional administration of medicine. Apart from overcoming the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics limitations of many potential therapeutic molecules, they may also be useful for advanced drug delivery purposes like targeted drug delivery, controlled release, enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. In this review, we attempt to describe an up-to-date knowledge on various strategically devised nanostructures to overcome the problems related to oral drug administration.

Indexed as

5-FU, 5-fluorouracilAD, Alzheimer’s diseaseAmB, amphotericin BAMCNS, cationic niosome-based azithromycin delivery systemsAP, acetylpuerarinAT1R, angiotensin II receptor type 1BCRP, breast cancer resistance proteinCNL, conventional lipid nanoparticlesCSC, core shell corona nanolipoparticlesDCK, N-deoxycholyl-l-lysyl-methylesterDDS, drug delivery systemDM, diabetes mellitusDOX, doxorubicinDrug delivery systemEPR, enhanced permeability and retention effectFRET, Foster resonance energy transferGI, gastrointestinalGMO, glyceryl monooleinIBD, inflammatory bowel diseaseLG, Lakshadi GuggulLNC, Lipid NanocapsuleMFS, MiltefosineMNBNC, Micronucleated Binucleated CellsMSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticleMTX, methotrexateNanostructuresNPC, nanoparticulate carriersNP, nanoparticleNSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugOA, osteoarthritisOral medicineOXA, oxaliplatinPAMAM, poly (amidoamine)PD, Parkinson’s diseasePEG, polyethylene glycolPIP, 1-piperoylpiperidinePLGA, polylactic-co-glycolic acidPNL, PEGylated lipid nanoparticlespSiO, porous silica oxidepSi, porous siliconPZQ, praziquantelSLN, solid lipid nanoparticleSMA, styrene maleic acidSMEDD, self microemulsifying drug delivery systemTB, tuberculosisTmf, tamoxifenTNBS, trinitrobenzenesulphonic acidTPGS, tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinateWGA, wheat germ agglutinin

Identifiers

PMID31080743
PMCPMC6502743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.