Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080708›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019

Public employees in South-Western Norway using an e-bike or a regular bike for commuting - A cross-sectional comparison on sociodemographic factors, commuting frequency and commuting distance.

Anette B Jahre, Elling Bere, Solveig Nordengen, Ane Solbraa, Lars Bo Andersen, Amund Riiser, Helga Birgit Bjørnarå

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Correlates of Commuter Cycling in Three Norwegian Counties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anette B JahreDepartment of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Servicebox 422, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Elling BereDepartment of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Servicebox 422, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Solveig NordengenWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sport, Post Box 133, 6851 Sogndal, Norway.
Ane SolbraaWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sport, Post Box 133, 6851 Sogndal, Norway.
Lars Bo AndersenWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sport, Post Box 133, 6851 Sogndal, Norway.
Amund RiiserWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sport, Post Box 133, 6851 Sogndal, Norway.
Helga Birgit BjørnaråDepartment of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Servicebox 422, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale analyses on the travel behavior of e-bikes are scarce, and current knowledge regarding who the e-bike owners are is inconsistent. Also, commuters represent a relevant user group with an unexploited potential. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine (i) associations between type of bike (e-bike vs. regular bike) with place of residence (county), sociodemographic variables (age, sex, educational level, income and ethnicity) and habitual physical activity level, and (ii) if public employees possessing an e-bike cycle more often and longer distances to work. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2017 among 1977 (5.2% of eligible subjects) public employees in Southern and Western Norway. Binary and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted. Respondents possessing an e-bike were less likely to perform high levels of leisure time physical activity (OR 0.56 (CI 0.39-0.82)), compared to those possessing a regular bike only. For those residing in Agder, the likelihood of possessing an e-bike (vs. regular bike) was almost 4 times higher (OR 3.98 (CI 2.53-6.26)), compared with participants residing in Sogn og Fjordane. Compared with those possessing a regular bike only, e-bike users cycled more frequently to work, both occasionally (OR 3.71 (CI 2.44-5.65)) and most of the time (OR 4.28 (CI 2.79-6.55)), and they had higher odds of cycling medium distances to the workplace (OR 1.74 (CI 1.04-2.90)). In conclusion, e-bike access could result in increased commuter cycling, both in terms of cycling frequency and cycling distance, which in turn could contribute to enhanced physical activity levels.

Indexed as

Active commutingActive travelAgder, Aust-Agder and Vest-Agder countiesBicycleE-bikeE-bike, electric bicycleMVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activityPA, physical activityPublic employeesSouthern NorwayWestern Norway

Identifiers

PMID31080708
PMCPMC6503162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.