ArticleZeitschrift fur Psychologie2017
Misunderstanding RDoC.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying the Research Domain Criteria to Social Determinants of Community Mental Health in Low-Resource Settings: A Contextualized Framework with Insights from the TOPOWA Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Emotion Dysregulation and Error Monitoring in Adolescents with ADHD.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Article
- Theories of psychopathology: Potential to promote clinical science, empowerment, and justice.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2023Article
- Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Progress and Potential.Current directions in psychological science · 2022Article
- Examining the dimensionality of anxiety and depression: A latent profile approach to modeling transdiagnostic features.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2022Article
- Developmental Trajectories of Anhedonia in Preclinical Models.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022Article
- Measuring the Biological Embedding of Racial Trauma Among Black Americans Utilizing the RDoC Approach.Development and psychopathology · 2021Review
- The Developmental Origins of Opioid Use Disorder and Its Comorbidities.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Magnetoencephalography for Schizophrenia.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Identifying electrophysiological markers of autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia against a backdrop of normal brain development.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental illness is fundamentally mental, by definition about psychological rather than biological phenomena, but biological phenomena play key roles in understanding, preventing, and treating mental illness. The Research Domain Criteria initiative (RDoC) of the US National Institute of Mental Health is an unusually ambitious effort to foster integration of psychological and biological science in the service of psychopathology research. Some key features and common misunderstandings of RDoC are discussed here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.