Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080659›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Paravertebral catheter analgesia for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy.

Jan Willem van den Berg, Kate Tabrett, Edward Cheong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06563557 (ERASME ULB), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06563557 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ERASME ULB: Erasme Randomized Controlled Trial Surveys Hemodynamic Excursions During Esophagectomy - a Double Blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled75ConditionsEsophagectomy, Epidural, Anesthesia, Paravertebral AnesthesiaArmsHemodynamic changes between epidural and paravertebral during esophagectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan Willem van den BergNorfolk and Norwich Oesophago-gastric Cancer Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Kate TabrettNorfolk and Norwich Oesophago-gastric Cancer Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Edward CheongNorfolk and Norwich Oesophago-gastric Cancer Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, UK.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOesophagectomy is a major complex operation associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Epidural analgesia has long been the gold standard postoperative analgesia but is associated with side-effects like hypotension, epidural haematoma and infection. In an attempt to lower morbidity and enhance recovery postoperatively, we have adopted the use of paravertebral catheter analgesia (PVCA) for patients undergoing totally minimal invasive oesophagectomy (TMIO).

methodsOur objective was to review the current literature about the use of both PVCA and epidural analgesia. In addition, we evaluated the effect of PVCA in a large group of patients undergoing TMIO for cancer. We reviewed the records of 100 consecutive patients who had a TMIO with PVCA, spinal morphine, and PCA. Prospective independent scoring of postoperative pain, length of stay, high-dependency unit (HDU) stay, PVCA failure, the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and the use of vasoconstrictor medication postoperatively was analysed.

resultsOne hundred consecutive patients received PVCA with PCA after the TMIO. Catheter related failures occurred in 4 cases. The median pain score over each of the 5 days were 0. The average pain score was highest in the first 24 hours and decreased over the next 4 days postoperatively. The use of PCA was highest in the first 2 days and reduced daily over the subsequent 3 days. Seven patients required rescue analgesia in the form of intercostal nerve (ICN) block. Spinal morphine was successful in 94% of cases. Vasoconstrictors were required in 19% on day 1 and 3% on day 2, postoperatively.

conclusionsIntraoperative placement of PVCA results in good postoperative pain control after a TMIO. This technique is simple, safe, reproducible and with very low failure rates. Therefore, it should be used instead of epidural catheter analgesia.

Indexed as

minimally invasive oesophagectomyoesophagectomyParavertebral catheter analgesia (PVCA)

Identifiers

PMID31080659
PMCPMC6503262
OpenAlexW2925291639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.