ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2019
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal lesions on an outpatient basis.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogel adhesives for upper gastrointestinal wound healing.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Outcomes and validity of risk stratification tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in Western Australia.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of outpatient colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Outpatient hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with SOUTEN for early gastric cancer, followed by endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defect: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Predicting procedure duration of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Western endoscopy centers.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Feasibility of same-day discharge following endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal or gastric early cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Wide-field endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus neoplasia.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection on an outpatient basis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Setting the stage for research in endoscopy.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Dual Action Tissue Clip: A New Kid on the Block for Large Defect Closure - Report of Two Cases.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is usually associated with hospital admission. Objectives: To evaluate, prospectively, the feasibility, safety and efficacy of outpatient gastrointestinal ESD. Methods: Patients with suitable lesions were invited to participate. Those that dwelt more than 1 hour from the hospital, lived alone, had severe co-morbidities, were <18 years old, had duodenal lesions, or that had ESD-related complications were admitted. The remaining patients were discharged if no complications were detected. A patients' inquiry was performed. Results: Of the 164 ESD patients, 122 were outpatient-based, corresponding to 115 patients, 47% male and mean age 63 ± 12 years-old. Outpatients tended to be younger, female, to have gastric lesions, less advanced lesions, and shorter and less complicated ESDs (all Conclusion: Risks of ambulatory ESD are low and complications can be successfully managed. This strategy has high patient satisfaction. More studies are needed to evaluate its implications on costs and patients' management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.