Time to give up on expanded scope of practice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluating the effect of computer-based education on pharmacist behaviour regarding point-of-care testing.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
   Article
2. Implementation of the California advanced practice pharmacist and the continued disappointment of tiered licensure.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
   Article
3. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection by community pharmacists.BMC health services research · 2019
   Article
4. It's time to prioritize the various roles of the pharmacist.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Article
5. Leadership training for pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Article
6. The evolution of pharmacy practice research-Part I: Time to implement the evidence.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Article
7. Regulation and innovation in practice - Not a "drug interaction"?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Article
8. Barriers to a full scope of pharmacy practice in primary care: A systematic review of pharmacists' access to laboratory testing.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Review
9. Shared decision making and antibiotic stewardship: Will pharmacists rise to the challenge?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
   Article
10. Evidence and its impact on pharmacy practice: Don't be "evidence-illiterate".Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
11. Patient-oriented pharmacy practice research: Why should we care?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
12. The journey begins: BC roadmap for pharmacist integration into team-based primary care.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
13. There should only be one most responsible provider.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
14. Enhancing access to contraception through pharmacist prescribing across Canada.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
15. Are pharmacists really "well placed"?Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
16. The last 10 years of pharmacy practice, as told throughCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
17. Regulating pharmacist services: Achieving a full scope of practice.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
18. Accessibility reality check.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
19. Why pharmacist prescribing needs to beCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
20. A leadership crisis in pharmacy.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.