ArticleMobile DNA2019
Retrotransposons evolution and impact on lncRNA and protein coding genes in pigs.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive map of the bovine mobilome and their epigenetic regulation of mastitis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- A 280 bp SINE insertion within the pig PLA2G16 could potentially modify gene expression through integration with its transcript.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- Impact of the 294 bp SINE Insertion in 5'UTR of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Population structure and genetic diversity of Mi pigs based on SINE-RIPs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Article
- Population genetic analysis based on the polymorphisms mediated by transposons in the genomes of pig.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024Article
- Article
- Retroviral Insertion Polymorphism (RIP) of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs) in Pig Genomes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Taming transposable elements in livestock and poultry: a review of their roles and applications.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Review
- SINE Insertion in the Pig Carbonic Anhydrase 5BAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Pangenome obtained by long-read sequencing of 11 genomes reveal hidden functional structural variants in pigs.iScience · 2023Article
- Two Retrotransposon Elements in Intron of PorcineLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Genetic Evaluation and Population Structure of Jiangsu Native Pigs in China Revealed by SINE Insertion Polymorphisms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Retrotransposon Insertion Polymorphisms (RIPs) in Pig Coat Color Candidate Genes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- A 192 bp ERV fragment insertion in the first intron of porcine TLR6 may act as an enhancer associated with the increased expressions of TLR6 and TLR1.Mobile DNA · 2021Article
- Distinct Retrotransposon Evolution Profile in the Genome of Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrotransposons are the major determinants of genome sizes and they have shaped both genes and genomes in mammalian organisms, but their overall activity, diversity, and evolution dynamics, particularly their impact on protein coding and lncRNA genes in pigs remain largely unknown.
resultsIn the present study, we performed de novo detection of retrotransposons in pigs by using multiple pipelines, four distinct families of pig-specific L1 s classified into 51 distinct subfamilies and representing four evolution models and three expansion waves of pig-specific SINEs represented by three distinct families were identified. ERVs were classified into 18 families and found two most "modern" subfamilies in the pig genome. The transposition activity of pig L1 was verified by experiment, the sense and antisense promoter activities of young L1 5'UTRs and ERV LTRs and expression profiles of young retrotransposons in multiple tissues and cell lines were also validated. Furthermore, retrotransposons had an extensive impact on lncRNA and protein coding genes at both the genomic and transcriptomic levels. Most protein coding and lncRNA (> 80%) genes contained retrotransposon insertions, and about half of protein coding genes (44.30%) and one-fourth (24.13%) of lncRNA genes contained the youngest retrotransposon insertions. Nearly half of protein coding genes (43.78%) could generate chimeric transcripts with retrotransposons. Significant distribution bias of retrotransposon composition, location, and orientation in lncRNA and protein coding genes, and their transcripts, were observed.
conclusionsIn the current study, we characterized the classification and evolution profile of retrotransposons in pigs, experimentally proved the transposition activity of the young pig L1 subfamily, characterized the sense and antisense expression profiles and promoter activities of young retrotransposons, and investigated their impact on lncRNA and protein coding genes by defining the mobilome landscapes at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. These findings help provide a better understanding of retrotransposon evolution in mammal and their impact on the genome and transcriptome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.