ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2019
Individualization of FSH Doses in Assisted Reproduction: Facts and Fiction.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Type of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Medication Given for In Vitro Fertilization Impacts Oocyte Retrieval: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond the Umbrella: A Systematic Review of the Interventions for the Prevention of and Reduction in the Incidence and Severity of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Who Undergo In Vitro Fertilization Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Algorithm-based individualization methodology of the starting gonadotropin dose in IVF/ICSI and the freeze-all strategy prevent OHSS equally in normal responders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the evidence.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of polymorphisms of MTHFR in controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007-2017).Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021Pooled it
- Integrated Prediction System for Individualized Ovarian Stimulation and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Prevention: Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Reducing Photo-Oxidative Stress in IVF: A Retrospective Analysis of Cycles with Poor Blastocyst Development.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world use of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support tool for ovarian stimulation.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Clinical FSH Conundrum: Insights From the Small Ovarian Reserve Heifer Model.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025Review
- Development of a novel calculator to predict gonadotropin dose and oocyte yield in oocyte cryopreservation cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of the number of oocytes obtained during in vitro fertilization treatments.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Observational
- Exploring gonadotropin dosing effects on MII oocyte retrieval in ovarian stimulation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Are they functional hypogonadal men? Testosterone serum levels unravel male idiopathic infertility subgroups.Endocrine · 2024Article
- The prospect of artificial intelligence to personalize assisted reproductive technology.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Nonlinear relationship between gonadotropin total dose applied and live birth rates in non-PCOS patients: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Potential effects of assisted reproductive technology on telomere length and telomerase activity in human oocytes and early embryos.Journal of ovarian research · 2023Review
- Quantitative approaches in clinical reproductive endocrinology.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022Review
- Regulation of antral follicular growth by an interplay between gonadotropins and their receptors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Review
- Women in Advanced Reproductive Age: Are the Follicular Output Rate, the Follicle-Oocyte Index and the Ovarian Sensitivity Index Predictors of Live Birth in an IVF Cycle?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The art of ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI treatment using exogenous FSH should be balanced against the relative contribution of other steps of the ART process such as the IVF-lab-phase and the Embryo-Transfer. The aim of ovarian stimulation is to obtain a certain number of oocytes, that will enable the best probability of achieving a live birth. It has been suggested that more oocytes will create a better prospect for pregnancy, but studies on the question whether the retrieval of a few oocytes less or more will make the difference are not clearly supportive for this mantra. Personalization strategies have been the subject of many studies over the past 20 years. Creating the optimal response in a patient in terms of live birth prognosis as well as OHSS risks may be based on information from the Ovarian Reserve testing using the Antral Follicle Count or Anti-Mullerian Hormone, the patient's bodyweight, the ovarian response in a previous cycle, and the dosage level of FSH. Taken together, steering the ovarian response into a supposed optimal range may appear difficult as the interrelation for each of these factors with the egg number is weak. Using OR testing for choosing FSH dosage, compared to a standard normal dosage of 150 IU, has been studied in several trials. Dosage individualization, in general, does not appear to improve the prospects for live birth, but the reduction in OHSS risk may be substantial. This implies that the use of high dosages of FSH in predicted LOW responders lacks any cost-benefit for the patient and may be abandoned, while in predicted HIGH responders, reduction of the usual dosage level of 150 IU may create better safety, provided that in case of an unexpected LOW response cancelation of the cycle is refrained from. In view of recent developments in using GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation, the trend could be that with the Antagonist co-medication system and a standard dosage of 150 IU of FSH, prior ovarian reserve testing may become futile, as safety can be managed well in actual HIGH responders by replacing the high dose hCG trigger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.