Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31080400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Multichannel Silicon Probes for Awake Hippocampal Recordings in Large Animals.

Alexandra V Ulyanova, Carlo Cottone, Christopher D Adam, Kimberly G Gagnon, D Kacy Cullen, Tahl Holtzman, Brian G Jamieson, Paul F Koch, H Isaac Chen, Victoria E Johnson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fabrication and Validation of Sub-Cellular Carbon Fiber Electrodes.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrating Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Neural Classification.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra V UlyanovaCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Carlo CottoneCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Christopher D AdamCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Kimberly G GagnonCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
D Kacy CullenCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Tahl HoltzmanCambridge NeuroTech, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Brian G JamiesonScientific & Biomedical Microsystems, Glen Burnie, MD, United States.
Paul F KochCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
H Isaac ChenCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Victoria E JohnsonCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
John A WolfCenter for Brain Injury and Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USCancer Research UK Cambridge Center · GBParents' Place of Maryland · US

Funding

BRIAN INJURY TRAINING GRANTT32NS043126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Douglas Hamilton Smith · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Network Dysfunction and Neuromodulation following TBIR01NS101108 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI John Allen Wolf · 2017 to 2026
$3.3M
Chronic neurodegenerative and neurophysiological sequela of closed-head TBII01RX001097 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DUDA, JOHN ERIC · 2015 to 2018
–
Neuromodulation as a Therapy for PTSD following Chronic TBII01RX002705 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI John Allen Wolf · 2018 to 2026
–
Mechanisms of Cortico-Limbic Network Dysfunction Underlying PTSD after TBIIK2RX001479 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WOLF, JOHN ALLEN · 2015 to 2018
–
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101108NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS043126RRD VA I01 RX001097RRD VA I01 RX002705RRD VA IK2 RX001479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoding laminar information across deep brain structures and cortical regions is necessary in order to understand the neuronal ensembles that represent cognition and memory. Large animal models are essential for translational research due to their gyrencephalic neuroanatomy and significant white matter composition. A lack of long-length probes with appropriate stiffness allowing penetration to deeper structures with minimal damage to the neural interface is one of the major technical limitations to applying the approaches currently utilized in lower order animals to large animals. We therefore tested the performance of multichannel silicon probes of various solutions and designs that were developed specifically for large animal electrophysiology. Neurophysiological signals from dorsal hippocampus were recorded in chronically implanted awake behaving Yucatan pigs. Single units and local field potentials were analyzed to evaluate performance of given silicon probes over time. EDGE-style probes had the highest yields during intra-hippocampal recordings in pigs, making them the most suitable for chronic implantations and awake behavioral experimentation. In addition, the cross-sectional area of silicon probes was found to be a crucial determinant of silicon probe performance over time, potentially due to reduction of damage to the neural interface. Novel 64-channel EDGE-style probes tested acutely produced an optimal single unit separation and a denser sampling of the laminar structure, identifying these research silicon probes as potential candidates for chronic implantations. This study provides an analysis of multichannel silicon probes designed for large animal electrophysiology of deep laminar brain structures, and suggests that current designs are reaching the physical thresholds necessary for long-term (∼1 month) recordings with single-unit resolution.

Indexed as

awake chronic recordingslaminar hippocampal electrophysiologylarge animalsmultichannel silicon probesoscillationspigssingle units

Identifiers

PMID31080400
PMCPMC6497800
OpenAlexW2888017028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.