Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31079591›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2019

Using Cell Cultures for the Investigation of Treatments for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Danielly Chierrito, Camila B Villas-Boas, Fernanda S Tonin, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Andréia C C Sanches, João C P de Mello

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. An In Vitro and In Silico Investigation aboutAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielly ChierritoDepartment of Pharmacy, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Brazil.
Camila B Villas-BoasDepartment of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana, Cascavel, Brazil.
Fernanda S ToninDepartment of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosiMed.ULisboa, Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Andréia C C SanchesDepartment of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana, Cascavel, Brazil.
João C P de MelloDepartment of Pharmacy, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in basic and molecular biology have promoted the use of cell cultures in a wide range of areas, including the evaluation of drug efficacy, safety and toxicity.

objectiveThis article aims to provide a general overview of the methodological parameters of cell cultures used to investigate therapeutic options for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

methodA systematic search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and DOAJ. In vitro experimental studies using cell cultures were included.

resultsA total of 328 studies were initially identified, with 16 included for qualitative synthesis. Seven studies used neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and PC12 cell line) and nine used nonneuronal cells. All the studies described the culture conditions, but most studies were inconsistent with regard to reporting results and raw data. Only one-third of the studies performed cell viability assays, while a further 30% conducted gene expression analysis. Other additional tests included electrophysiological evaluation and transporter activity. More than 50% of the studies evaluated the effects of drugs such as methylphenidate and atomoxetine, while plant extracts were assessed in four studies and polyunsaturated fatty acids in one.

conclusionWe suggested a flowchart to guide the planning and execution of studies, and a checklist to be completed by authors to allow the standardized reporting of results. This may guide the elaboration of laboratory protocols and further in vitro studies.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCells, CulturedCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildHumansMethylphenidateNeuronsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateADHDADHD treatmentCell modelchecklistflowchartmethodological aspectneuronal cell.

Identifiers

PMID31079591
PMCPMC7052832
OpenAlexW2946665318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.