ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2019
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalizing cancer risk: a systematic review of risk communication strategies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening-A systematic review with meta-analyses.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Navigating false-positive outcomes after stool-based colorectal cancer screening tests: a scoping review.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Psychosocial impact of false-positive surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Experience of NHS diagnostic investigation following a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test: qualitative interviews with NHS-Galleri trial participants who had a cancer signal detected.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- From Detection to Delay: Real-World Gaps in Post-CologuardJournal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Modelling the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with HPV self-sampling and molecular triage for women aged 60-69 years.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Screening participants with inflammatory bowel disease or high colorectal cancer risk in Denmark: a cohort study.Journal of public health policy · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and urology: ethical considerations for urologists and patients.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Machine learning clinical prediction models for acute kidney injury: the impact of baseline creatinine on prediction efficacy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Evaluation of AFP and CEA External Proficiency Testing Reveals Need for Method Harmonization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopyPreventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Assessing overdiagnosis of fecal immunological test screening for colorectal cancer with a digital twin approach.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- False Atrial Fibrillation Alerts from Smartwatches are Associated with Decreased Perceived Physical Well-being and Confidence in Chronic Symptoms Management.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Women's perceptions of cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.