Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31079297›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Agricultural and domestic pesticides in house dust from different agricultural areas in France.

Rémi Béranger, Elise Billoir, John R Nuckols, Jeffrey Blain, Maurice Millet, Marie-Laure Bayle, Bruno Combourieu, Thierry Philip, Joachim Schüz, Beatrice Fervers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pesticide Exposure of Residents Living in Wine Regions: Protocol and First Results of the Pestiprev Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rémi BérangerDepartment of Cancer and Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. remi.beranger@univ-rennes1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6608-8020
Elise BilloirRovaltain Research Company, Valence, France.
John R NuckolsColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Jeffrey BlainDepartment of Cancer and Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Maurice MilletInstitut de Chimie et Procédés pour l'Energie, l'Environnement et la Santé (ICPEES, UMR 7515 CNRS), University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Marie-Laure BayleRovaltain Research Company, Valence, France.
Bruno CombourieuRovaltain Research Company, Valence, France.
Thierry PhilipDepartment of Cancer and Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Joachim SchüzSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Beatrice FerversDepartment of Cancer and Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Centre Léon Bérard · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRHemanext (United States) · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides have been associated with various pathologies, and there is growing evidence of pesticide presence in domestic environments. However, most available studies focused on a limited number of pesticides or households, and few have been conducted in Europe. We aimed to assess indoor pesticide contamination by screening the prevalence of 276 pesticides and ten pesticide metabolites, in French households from different agricultural and urban areas. We sampled indoor dust from 239 households in 2012, proximate to orchards (n = 69), cereals (n = 66) and vineyard (n = 68) crops, or from urban area (n = 36). we used cellulose wipes moistened with isopropanol and polypropylene dust traps to collect recent (7 and 30 days, respectively) and settled dust (> 6 months). Overall, 125 pesticides and piperonyl butoxide were detected at least once in households, mostly at low prevalence: 97 in recent dust, and 111 in settled dust. In recent dust, the most prevalent compounds were o-phenylphenol (168 households, 70%), pentachlorophenol (86, 36%), and piperonyl butoxide (82, 34%). In addition to agricultural pesticides, we found a high proportion of domestic and banned compounds in recent and settled house dust. Several pesticides were identified in house dust, from different pesticide groups and sources. Our results suggest that domestic usage and persistence of banned pesticides may contribute substantially to indoor pesticide contamination. Graphical abstract 97 pesticides detected in households' recent indoor dust.

Indexed as

Crop ProductionAir Pollution, IndoorDustEnvironmental MonitoringFranceHousingHumansPesticidesDustPesticidesAgricultureAirborne contaminationDustGardeningPesticides

Identifiers

PMID31079297
OpenAlexW2944428337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.