Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31079243›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2020

Short ultrasonic debridement with adjunctive low-concentrated hypochlorite/amino acid gel during periodontal maintenance: randomized clinical trial of 12 months.

Andrew Megally, Alkisti Zekeridou, José Cancela, Catherine Giannopoulou, Andrea Mombelli

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew MegallyUniversity Clinic of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Alkisti ZekeridouUniversity Clinic of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
José CancelaUniversity Clinic of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Catherine GiannopoulouUniversity Clinic of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Andrea MombelliUniversity Clinic of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. andrea.mombelli@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-8503

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit of repeated subgingival cleaning with a low-concentrated hypochlorite/amino acid gel in subjects in maintenance care with residual pockets ≥ 5 mm. MATERIAL AND

methodsExaminer masked, randomized two-arm parallel design. Thirty-two adult periodontal patients in maintenance phase, > 3 months after periodontal therapy, with at least one residual periodontal pocket ≥ 5 mm, were randomly assigned to treatment by subgingival ultrasonic debridement with the gel or ultrasonic debridement only. At months 0, 4, and 8, all sites presenting with a probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm were treated. Six sites were monitored on each tooth. The primary end point was the presence or absence of PD ≥ 5 mm after 12 months. Secondary clinical outcomes were oral tissue safety; patient acceptance; changes in PD; bleeding on probing; recession after 4, 8, and 12 months; and the presence or absence of six target microorganisms in treated pockets at baseline, after 7 days and 4 months.

resultsA total of 365 sites in 32 patients with PD ≥ 5 mm were treated at baseline. At the final evaluation at month 12, 47% of these sites in the test and 49% in the control group were still in this PD category. The difference between baseline and month 12 was significant in both groups (p < 0.01), whereas the difference between groups was not. Repeated short ultrasonic instrumentation with adjunctive administration of the test product resulted in a clinical attachment level (CAL) gain of 1.02 mm (p < 0.01) and led to - 0.97 mm of pocket reduction (p < 0.01) without inducing further recession. However, repeated short ultrasonic debridement without the gel led to a similar clinical outcome (p < 0.01). No adverse events were recorded.

conclusionsShort ultrasonic instrumentation of residual pockets with PD ≥ 5 mm during maintenance visits resulted in a clinically relevant CAL gain and PD reduction in the order of 1 mm in 1 year, without inducing further recession. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study corroborates the benefit of regular maintenance care after periodontal therapy, including short debridement of the residual pockets.

Indexed as

Hypochlorous AcidPeriodontal DebridementUltrasonicsAdultAmino AcidsDebridementDental Plaque IndexDental ScalingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansTreatment OutcomeAmino AcidsHypochlorous AcidClinical trialHypochlorite/amino acid gelMaintenanceSubgingival plaque removal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.