Observational studyJACC. Heart failure2019
Ambulatory Advanced Heart Failure in Women: A Report From the REVIVAL Registry.
Observational study in JACC. Heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in patients with advanced heart failure: an analysis of the HELP-HF registry.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Depressive Symptoms for Cardiovascular Events in Female Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Addressing Barriers for Women with Advanced Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Gender Differences in Experiences and Expectations of Hemodialysis in a Frail and Seriously Unwell Patient Population.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Special Considerations in the Care of Women With Advanced Heart Failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Exploring gender differences in trajectories of clinical markers and symptoms after left ventricular assist device implantation.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2021Article
- Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life, Burden, and Patient Outcomes in Ambulatory Advanced Heart Failure: A Report From REVIVAL.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Observational
- Palliative Care for People Living With Heart Disease-Does Sex Make a Difference?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Sex differences in eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.Clinical transplantation · 2020Article
- Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- State of the Science in Women's Cardiovascular Disease: A Canadian Perspective on the Influence of Sex and Gender.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Review
- REVIVAL of the Sex Disparities Debate: Are Women Denied, Never Referred, or Ineligible for Heart Replacement Therapies?JACC. Heart failure · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to explore clinical characteristics and outcomes in women and men with ambulatory advanced heart failure (HF).
backgroundWomen have been underrepresented in studies of advanced HF and have an increased mortality on the transplant waiting list and early after mechanical circulatory support (MCS). An increased understanding of the differential burden of HF between women and men is required to inform the use of mechanical circulatory support in ambulatory advanced HF patients.
methodsREVIVAL (Registry Evaluation for Vital Information on Ventricular Assist Devices in Ambulatory Life) is a prospective, observational study of 400 outpatients with chronic systolic HF, New York Heart Association functional class II to IV, and 1 additional high-risk feature. Clinical characteristics, quality of life, and functional capacity were compared between women and men, as was a primary composite endpoint of death, durable MCS, or urgent heart transplantation at 1 year.
resultsREVIVAL enrolled 99 women (25% of the cohort) who had similar age, ejection fraction, INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) profiles, medication use, and willingness to consider MCS as the men enrolled; however, women reported significantly greater limitations in quality of life with respect to physical limitation, reduced 6-min walk distance, and more frequent symptoms of depression. Nevertheless, 1-year combined risk of death, durable MCS, or urgent transplantation did not differ between women and men (24% vs. 22%; p = 0.94).
conclusionsThis study represents the largest report to date of women with ambulatory advanced HF receiving contemporary therapies. Systematic elicitation of patient-reported outcome measures uncovered an added burden of HF in women and may be an appropriate target of augmented support and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.