Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31078143›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2019

Prospective observational study of early respiratory management in preterm neonates less than 35 weeks of gestation.

Fernando R Moya, Jan Mazela, Paul M Shore, Steven G Simonson, Robert Segal, Phillip D Simmons, Timothy J Gregory, Carlos G Guardia, Judy R Varga, Neil N Finer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of Unplanned Extubations Associated with Orotracheal versus Nasotracheal Intubation in Infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando R MoyaUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jan MazelaPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Paul M ShoreWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Steven G SimonsonWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Robert SegalWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA. rsegal@windtreetx.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9621-0437
Phillip D SimmonsWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Timothy J GregoryWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Carlos G GuardiaWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Judy R VargaWindtree Therapeutics, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA.
Neil N FinerUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Preterm Neonate Early Respiratory Management Prospective Observational Study investigators
Windtree Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines for management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) recommend continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as the primary mode of respiratory support even in the most premature neonates, reserving endotracheal intubation (ETI) for rescue surfactant or respiratory failure. The incidence and timing of ETI in practice is poorly documented.

methodsIn 27 Level III NICUs in the US (n = 19), Canada (n = 3) and Poland (n = 5), demographics and baseline characteristics, respiratory support modalities including timing of ETI, administration of surfactant and caffeine/other methylxanthines, and neonatal morbidities were prospectively recorded in consecutive preterm neonates following written parental consent. Infants were divided into three groups according to gestational age (GA) at birth, namely 26-28, 29-32 and 33-34 weeks. Statistical comparisons between groups were done using Chi-Square tests.

resultsOf 2093 neonates (US = 1507, 254 Canada, 332 Poland), 378 (18%) were 26-28 weeks gestational age (GA), 835 (40%) were 29-32 weeks, and 880 (42%) were 33-34 weeks. Antenatal steroid use was 81% overall, and approximately 89% in neonates ≤32 weeks. RDS incidence and use of ventilatory or supplemental oxygen support were similar across all sites. CPAP was initiated in 43% of all infants, being highest in the 29-32-week group, with a lower proportion in other GA categories (p < 0.001). The overall rate of ETI was 74% for neonates 26-28 weeks (42% within 15 min of birth, 49% within 60 min, and 57% within 3 h), 33% for 29-32 weeks (13 16 and 21%, respectively), and 16% for 33-34 weeks (5, 6 and 8%, respectively). Overall intubation rates and timing were similar between countries in all GAs. Rates within each country varied widely, however. Across US sites, overall ETI rates in 26-28-week neonates were 30-60%, and ETI within 15 min varied from 0 to 83%. Similar within 15-min variability was seen at Polish sites (22-67%) in this GA, and within all countries for 29-32 and 33-34-week neonates.

conclusionDespite published guidelines for management of RDS, rate and timing of ETI varies widely, apparently unrelated to severity of illness. The impact of this variability on outcome is unknown but provides opportunities for further approaches which can avoid the need for ETI.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAirway ManagementCanadaChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInternationalityMalePolandPregnancyPrognosisPulmonary SurfactantsContinuous positive airway pressureEndotracheal intubationPreterm neonateRespiratory managementSurfactant; prospective study

Identifiers

PMID31078143
PMCPMC6511129
OpenAlexW2947618420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.