ArticleEnvironment international2019
Cluster-based bagging of constrained mixed-effects models for high spatiotemporal resolution nitrogen oxides prediction over large regions.
Article in Environment international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outdoor Air Pollution and Brain Structure and Function From Across Childhood to Young Adulthood: A Methodological Review of Brain MRI Studies.Frontiers in public health · 2019Pooled it
- Independent and joint effects of neighborhood-level environmental and socioeconomic exposures on body mass index in early childhood: The environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) cohort.Environmental research · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for improving Nitrogen Dioxide forecasting of Abu Dhabi environment agency ground-based stations.Journal of big data · 2023Article
- Spatio-temporal modeling of COVID-19 prevalence and mortality using artificial neural network algorithms.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2022Article
- Bidirectional convolutional LSTM for the prediction of nitrogen dioxide in the city of Madrid.PloS one · 2022Article
- Contribution of tailpipe and non-tailpipe traffic sources to quasi-ultrafine, fine and coarse particulate matter in southern California.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) · 2021Article
- Ensemble-based deep learning for estimating PMEnvironment international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of nitrogen dioxide (NO
objectivesIn this study, we aim to develop highly accurate and adaptive machine learning models to predict high-resolution NO
methodsWe used a comprehensive Kruskal-K-means method to cluster the measurement samples from multiple heterogeneous sources. Spatiotemporal cluster-based bootstrap aggregating (bagging) of the base mixed-effects models was then applied, leveraging the clusters to obtain balanced and less correlated training samples for less bias and improvement in generalization. Further, we used the machine learning technique of grid search to find the optimal interaction of temporal basis functions and the scale of spatial effects, which, together with spatiotemporal covariates, adequately captured spatiotemporal variability in NO
resultsWe found an optimal combination of four temporal basis functions and 200 m scale spatial effects for the base mixed-effects models. With the cluster-based bagging of the base models, we obtained robust predictions with an ensemble cross validation R
conclusionsOur approach has important implications for fusing data from highly clustered and heterogeneous measurement samples from multiple data sources to produce highly accurate concentration estimates of air pollutants such as NO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.