Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077723›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2019

Cervical and colorectal cancer screening prevalence before and after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.

Nathalie Huguet, Heather Angier, Rebecca Rdesinski, Megan Hoopes, Miguel Marino, Heather Holderness, Jennifer E DeVoe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02936609 (Assessing Community Cancer Care After Insurance ExpanSionS), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02936609 completednot on this map

Assessing Community Cancer Care After Insurance ExpanSionS

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2021Enrolled1,939,783ConditionsCancerArmsMedicaid Expansion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Racial Differences in Expected Versus Actual Costs of Cervical Cancer Screening among Low-Income, Underscreened Women in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Latinas in the United States among a Network of Community Health Centers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States.
Heather AngierDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States.
Rebecca RdesinskiDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States.
Megan HoopesOCHIN Inc., 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, United States.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Heather HoldernessDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States. Electronic address: holdernh@ohsu.edu.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, United States.
Oregon Health & Science University · USOchin · US

Funding

Community-based HIT Tools for Cancer Screening and Health Insurance PromotionR01CA181452 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
ACCESS: Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionSR01CA204267 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Post Affordable Care Act: Evaluation of Community Health Centers (PACE)R01HS024270 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2015 to 2016
$796k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024270NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181452NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health centers (CHCs), which serve socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, experienced an increase in insured visits after the 2014 Affordable Care Act (ACA) coverage options began. Yet, little is known about how cancer screening rates changed post-ACA. Therefore, this study assessed changes in the prevalence of cervical and colorectal cancer screening from pre- to post-ACA in expansion and non-expansion states among patients seen in CHCs. Electronic health record data on 624,601 non-pregnant patients aged 21-64 eligible for cervical or colorectal cancer screening between 1/1/2012 and 12/31/2015 from 203 CHCs were analyzed. We assessed changes in prevalence and screening likelihood among patients, by insurance type and race/ethnicity and compared Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states using difference-in-difference methodology. Female patients had 19% increased odds of receiving cervical cancer screening post- relative to pre-ACA in expansion states [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-1.31] and 23% increased odds in non-expansion states (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05-1.46): the greatest increase was among uninsured patients in expansion states (aOR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.16-1.59) and privately-insured patients in non-expansion states (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.11-1.84). Colorectal cancer screening prevalence increased from 11% to 18% pre- to post-ACA in expansion states and from 13% to 21% in non-expansion states. For most outcomes, the observed changes were not significantly different between expansion and non-expansion states. Despite increased prevalences of cervical and colorectal cancer screening in both expansion and non-expansion states across all race/ethnicity groups, rates remained suboptimal for this population of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity Health CentersFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPrevalenceUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultAffordable Care ActCancer screeningMedicaidPrimary healthcareSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID31077723
PMCPMC6578572
OpenAlexW2944651053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.