Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077629›Full record

ArticleBJU international2019

Targeted deep sequencing of urothelial bladder cancers and associated urinary DNA: a 23-gene panel with utility for non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification.

Douglas G Ward, Naheema S Gordon, Rebecca H Boucher, Sarah J Pirrie, Laura Baxter, Sascha Ott, Lee Silcock, Celina M Whalley, Joanne D Stockton, Andrew D Beggs and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Image directed redesign of bladder cancer treatment pathways: the BladderPath RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prediction of Postoperative Intravesical Recurrence Using Urine DNA Monitoring in Nonmuscular-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas G WardInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2328-1445
Naheema S GordonInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca H BoucherInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah J PirrieInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Laura BaxterDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sascha OttDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Lee SilcockNonacus Limted, Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, UK.
Celina M WhalleyInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joanne D StocktonInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew D BeggsInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mike GriffithsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ben AbbottsInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hanieh IjakipourInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Fathimath N LatheefInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Robert A RobinsonInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew J WhiteInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicholas D JamesInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-8204
Maurice P ZeegersNUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism and CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
K K ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard T BryanInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-4293
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBBirmingham Research Park · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27035Cancer Research UK C1343/A5738Cancer Research UK CRUK/16/030Medical Research Council MR/M009157/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a focused panel of somatic mutations (SMs) present in the majority of urothelial bladder cancers (UBCs), to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of this panel, and to compare the identification of SMs in urinary cell-pellet (cp)DNA and cell-free (cf)DNA as part of the development of a non-invasive clinical assay. PATIENTS AND

methodsA panel of SMs was validated by targeted deep-sequencing of tumour DNA from 956 patients with UBC. In addition, amplicon and capture-based targeted sequencing measured mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) of SMs in 314 urine cpDNAs and 153 urine cfDNAs. The association of SMs with grade, stage, and clinical outcomes was investigated by univariate and multivariate Cox models. Concordance between SMs detected in tumour tissue and cpDNA and cfDNA was assessed.

resultsThe panel comprised SMs in 23 genes: TERT (promoter), FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, ERCC2, RHOB, ERBB2, HRAS, RXRA, ELF3, CDKN1A, KRAS, KDM6A, AKT1, FBXW7, ERBB3, SF3B1, CTNNB1, BRAF, C3orf70, CREBBP, CDKN2A, and NRAS; 93.5-98.3% of UBCs of all grades and stages harboured ≥1 SM (mean: 2.5 SMs/tumour). RAS mutations were associated with better overall survival (P = 0.04). Mutations in RXRA, RHOB and TERT (promoter) were associated with shorter time to recurrence (P < 0.05). MAFs in urinary cfDNA and cpDNA were highly correlated; using a capture-based approach, >94% of tumour SMs were detected in both cpDNA and cfDNA.

conclusionsSMs are reliably detected in urinary cpDNA and cfDNA. The technical capability to identify very low MAFs is essential to reliably detect UBC, regardless of the use of cpDNA or cfDNA. This 23-gene panel shows promise for the non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification of UBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, GeneticDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisRisk AssessmentSequence Analysis, DNAUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsDNA, Neoplasm#BladderCancer#blcsmdetectiondiagnosisDNAmutationsprognosisurine

Identifiers

PMID31077629
PMCPMC6772022
OpenAlexW2944137325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.