Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077596›Full record

ArticleAllergy2019

Modulation of CRTh2 expression on allergen-specific T cells following peptide immunotherapy.

Christopher D Rudulier, Elena Tonti, Eddie James, William W Kwok, Mark Larché

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Peptide immunotherapy for aeroallergens.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical and immunological evaluation of cat-allergic asthmatics living with or without a cat.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher D RudulierDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Elena TontiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eddie JamesBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington.
William W KwokBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-4599
Mark LarchéDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1439-7593
McMaster University Medical Centre · CAVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

The effect of peptide therapy and allergen provocation on Fel d1-specific T CellsU19AI100266 · NIAID · MCMASTER UNIVERSITY · PI LARCHE, MARK · 2012 to 2018
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100266Pharmaceuticals CP003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergen immunotherapy using synthetic peptide T-cell epitopes (Cat-PAD) from the major cat allergen Fel d 1 has been shown, in allergen exposure studies, to significantly reduce symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in cat-allergic subjects. However, the immunological mechanisms underlying clinical benefit remain only partially understood. Since previous studies of whole allergen immunotherapy demonstrated a reduction in the frequency of allergen-specific (MHC II tetramer

methodsUsing before and after treatment samples from subjects enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Cat-PAD, we employed Fel d 1 MHC II tetramers and flow cytometry to analyze the expression of chemokine receptors CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CXCR3, and CRTh2, together with markers of memory phenotype (CD27 and CCR7) on Fel d 1-specific CD4

resultsNo statistically significant change in the frequency of Fel d 1-specific CD4

conclusionsPeptide immunotherapy with Cat-PAD does not significantly alter the frequency or phenotype of Fel d 1-CD4

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAllergensAnimalsCatsDesensitization, ImmunologicEpitopes, T-LymphocyteGlycoproteinsHumansImmunologic MemoryImmunomodulationLymphocyte CountPeptidesReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ProstaglandinT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAllergensEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFel d 1 protein, Felis domesticusGlycoproteinsPeptidesprostaglandin D2 receptorReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Prostaglandinchemokinesimmunotherapy and tolerance inductionimmunotherapy vaccines and mechanismsT cellsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID31077596
PMCPMC6817377
OpenAlexW2944555638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.