Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077324›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Fitness Landscape of the Fission Yeast Genome.

Leanne Grech, Daniel C Jeffares, Christoph Y Sadée, María Rodríguez-López, Danny A Bitton, Mimoza Hoti, Carolina Biagosch, Dimitra Aravani, Maarten Speekenbrink, Christopher J R Illingworth and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The power of many: when genetics met yeasts and high-throughput.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Leanne GrechDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel C JeffaresDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christoph Y SadéeDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
María Rodríguez-LópezDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Danny A BittonDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mimoza HotiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carolina BiagoschDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dimitra AravaniDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maarten SpeekenbrinkExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher J R IllingworthDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Philipp H SchifferDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison L PidouxWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Pin TongWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Victor A TalladaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain.
Robin AllshireWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Henry L LevinDivision of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jürg BählerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo · ESNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Regulation And Function Of RetroelementsZIAHD001009 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI LEVIN, HENRY L. · 2009 to 2025
$21.8M
Development and application of transposable element technologyZIAHD008957 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI LEVIN, HENRY L. · 2016 to 2025
$6.0M
Wellcome Trust 095598/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 101239/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 200885/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between DNA sequence, biochemical function, and molecular evolution is relatively well-described for protein-coding regions of genomes, but far less clear in noncoding regions, particularly, in eukaryote genomes. In part, this is because we lack a complete description of the essential noncoding elements in a eukaryote genome. To contribute to this challenge, we used saturating transposon mutagenesis to interrogate the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome. We generated 31 million transposon insertions, a theoretical coverage of 2.4 insertions per genomic site. We applied a five-state hidden Markov model (HMM) to distinguish insertion-depleted regions from insertion biases. Both raw insertion-density and HMM-defined fitness estimates showed significant quantitative relationships to gene knockout fitness, genetic diversity, divergence, and expected functional regions based on transcription and gene annotations. Through several analyses, we conclude that transposon insertions produced fitness effects in 66-90% of the genome, including substantial portions of the noncoding regions. Based on the HMM, we estimate that 10% of the insertion depleted sites in the genome showed no signal of conservation between species and were weakly transcribed, demonstrating limitations of comparative genomics and transcriptomics to detect functional units. In this species, 3'- and 5'-untranslated regions were the most prominent insertion-depleted regions that were not represented in measures of constraint from comparative genomics. We conclude that the combination of transposon mutagenesis, evolutionary, and biochemical data can provide new insights into the relationship between genome function and molecular evolution.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenome, FungalModels, GeneticMutagenesis, InsertionalSchizosaccharomycescellular fitnessgene functionnoncoding genomeSchizosaccharomyces pombeTn-Seqtransposon mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID31077324
PMCPMC6657727
OpenAlexW2951547278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.