ArticleGigaScience2019
A highly predictive signature of cognition and brain atrophy for progression to Alzheimer's dementia.
Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Limited generalizability and high risk of bias in multivariable models predicting conversion risk from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Driven Digital Twin Architecture for Multimodal Prediction and Adaptive Intervention in Cognitive Aging.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- RDoC-informed explainable AI as a paradigm for multilevel Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and progression prediction: a systematic review.Brain informatics · 2026Review
- Bidirectional prognostic predictions of conversion and reversion in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- The Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform-An open science framework for the neuroscience community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Research on nonstroke dementia screening and cognitive function prediction model for older people based on brain atrophy characteristics.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Predicting future cognitive decline from non-brain and multimodal brain imaging data in healthy and pathological aging.Neurobiology of aging · 2022Article
- A high-generalizability machine learning framework for predicting the progression of Alzheimer's disease using limited data.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- The Road to Personalized Medicine in Alzheimer's Disease: The Use of Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Data-Driven Analyses of Longitudinal Hippocampal Imaging Trajectories: Discrimination and Biomarker Prediction of Change Classes.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Subtyping of mild cognitive impairment using a deep learning model based on brain atrophy patterns.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Article
- Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer's disease.Nature medicine · 2021Article
- A multiomics approach to heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease: focused review and roadmap.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Review
- A highly predictive signature of cognition and brain atrophy for progression to Alzheimer's dementia.GigaScience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials in Alzheimer's disease need to enroll patients whose cognition will decline over time, if left untreated, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of an intervention. Machine learning models used to screen for patients at risk of progression to dementia should therefore favor specificity (detecting only progressors) over sensitivity (detecting all progressors), especially when the prevalence of progressors is low. Here, we explore whether such high-risk patients can be identified using cognitive assessments and structural neuroimaging by training machine learning tools in a high-specificity regime.
resultsA multimodal signature of Alzheimer's dementia was first extracted from the ADNI1 dataset. We then validated the predictive value of this signature on ADNI1 patients with mild cognitive impairment (N = 235). The signature was optimized to predict progression to dementia over 3 years with low sensitivity (55.1%) but high specificity (95.6%), resulting in only moderate accuracy (69.3%) but high positive predictive value (80.4%, adjusted for a "typical" 33% prevalence rate of true progressors). These results were replicated in ADNI2 (N = 235), with 87.8% adjusted positive predictive value (96.7% specificity, 47.3% sensitivity, 85.1% accuracy).
conclusionsWe found that cognitive measures alone could identify high-risk individuals, with structural measurements providing a slight improvement. The signature had comparable receiver operating characteristics to standard machine learning tools, yet a marked improvement in positive predictive value was achieved over the literature by selecting a high-specificity operating point. The multimodal signature can be readily applied for the enrichment of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.