Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077276›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

Photopenic defects on O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET: clinical relevance in glioma patients.

Norbert Galldiks, Marcus Unterrainer, Natalie Judov, Gabriele Stoffels, Marion Rapp, Philipp Lohmann, Franziska Vettermann, Veronika Dunkl, Bogdana Suchorska, Jörg C Tonn and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Neuroradiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  16. DynamicFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Norbert GalldiksDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Natalie JudovInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Reseach Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Gabriele StoffelsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Reseach Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp LohmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Reseach Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Franziska VettermannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Veronika DunklDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Bogdana SuchorskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Jörg C TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Friedrich-Wilhem KrethDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Gereon R FinkDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3/-4), Reseach Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Nathalie L AlbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundO-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET has a sensitivity of more than 90% to detect gliomas. In the remaining small fraction of gliomas without increased tracer uptake, some tumors even show photopenic defects whose clinical significance is unclear.

methodsGlioma patients with a negative FET PET scan prior to neuropathological confirmation were identified retrospectively. Gliomas were rated visually as (i) having indifferent FET uptake or (ii) photopenic, if FET uptake was below background activity. FET uptake in the area of signal hyperintensity on the T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery-weighted MRI was evaluated by mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and mean tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR). The progression-free survival (PFS) of photopenic gliomas was compared with that of gliomas with indifferent FET uptake.

resultsOf 100 FET-negative gliomas, 40 cases with photopenic defects were identified. Fifteen of these 40 cases (38%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grades III and IV gliomas. FET uptake in photopenic gliomas was significantly decreased compared with both the healthy-appearing brain tissue (SUV, 0.89 ± 0.26 vs 1.08 ± 0.23; P < 0.001) and gliomas with indifferent FET uptake (TBR, 0.82 ± 0.09 vs 0.96 ± 0.13; P < 0.001). Irrespective of the applied treatment, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated WHO grade II diffuse astrocytoma patients with indifferent FET uptake (n = 25) had a significantly longer PFS than patients with IDH-mutated diffuse astrocytomas (WHO grade II) with photopenic defects (n = 11) (51 vs 24 mo; P = 0.027). The multivariate survival analysis indicated that photopenic defects predict an unfavorable PFS (P = 0.009).

conclusionPhotopenic gliomas in negative FET PET scans should be managed more actively, as they seem to have a higher risk of harboring a higher-grade glioma and an unfavorable outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyProgression-Free SurvivalRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTyrosineYoung AdultRadiopharmaceuticalsTyrosineFET-negative gliomasFET PEThypometabolic lesionslower-grade glioma

Identifiers

PMID31077276
PMCPMC6784268
OpenAlexW2767331809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.