Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31077194›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

A world map of esophagus cancer research: a critical accounting.

Doris Klingelhöfer, Yun Zhu, Markus Braun, Dörthe Brüggmann, Norman Schöffel, David A Groneberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Signaling pathways and their potential therapeutic utility in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Investigation ofIranian journal of pathology · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Doris KlingelhöferInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. klingelhoefer@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0716-9872
Yun ZhuIntegrative Medicine Centre, 302 Military Hospital, Beijing, China.
Markus BraunInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Dörthe BrüggmannInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Norman SchöffelInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide. The contemporary strong increase of the adenocarcinomas in Western countries and the high mortality rates require the intensification of prospective multinational studies.

methodsTherefore, this global health issue has been chosen for the bibliometric review of the global publication output. As source for meta and citation data, the Web of Science has been used and Density Equalizing Maps were applied for visualization.

results17,387 articles on EC could be identified. The years with publication and citation maxima correspond to the appearance of the most prolific articles. China is the most publishing country, followed by Japan and the USA. Germany and the UK ranked 4th and 5th. The analysis of the ratios articles and socio-economic parameters emphasizes the leading position of the Scandinavian countries and Japan. Here, the high-income countries come out on top. The high incidence regions are mainly represented by Chinese and Japanese research. The association of the publication output and the overall research funding could be shown.

conclusionsA strengthened international network increasingly consisting of the scientifically best positioned countries as well as more of the high incidence countries worldwide is mandatory for future research. The findings deliver scientists, clinicians and decision makers backgrounds for future decisions all over the world.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchInternationalityEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceInternational CooperationLinear ModelsPublicationsResearch Support as TopicSocioeconomic FactorsAdenocarcinomaCancer epidemiologyDisease burdenFundingIncidenceResearch trends

Identifiers

PMID31077194
PMCPMC6511204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.